this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
227 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37804 readers
215 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Until they take over and force a change that renders things back centralized into their hands.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That makes zero sense, that's not how the fediverse works. Explain how they would take over completely independent and unconnected instances that are defederated from them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Implement new features that only work when you integrate with Meta, then cut them out of the picture if they don't do what Meta says. The majority of users will stick with the instances that have the stickers and emojis that their friends have. Similar to what Google is doing with it's browser and the Internet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So we have the exact structure we have now. A centralized platform, or instance, for the people that don't care and our current federated instances for the people that do care.

This is all a big nothing burger. Continue to not use meta instances and platform like we're literally doing right now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Agreed. Truth be told, should the fediverse become mainstream, the masses will want the shiny bells and whistles and stick to the instances that support them. Those of us that could care less aren't going to be swayed by them, and steer clear. Unless FB somehow manages to take over the codebase and force everyone into their shit, I think we'll be fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

See also: Google with Gmail.

Good luck running your own mail server these days, and getting your messages actually delivered to Gmail and Outlook/O365 mailboxes. It's possible, but a hassle, and the rug can get pulled at any moment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Just configure your SPF record properly and you should be fine having emails delivered to gmail. I work in tech support for a small software company and every single time a customer is having issues with our email server not delivering to GMail, it's due to their SPF record being borked (which is on the customer's IT department, not us)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

By having "the masses", they can simply force things by not federating themselves. Email was already brought up and still federates but xmpp is a prime example where Facebook and google acquired a bunch of users and then walled off their access to federation. It all but killed xmpp as a tool in regular use outside of technically inclined circles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Meta already has the masses right now and is currently defederated from us as we speak, them making an instance and not federating would change literally nothing for us from our current structure.

Besides, it would be a benefit if they defederated themselves voluntarily. They've already shown their moderation to be shit and no telling what they'll try to do with our data, I wouldn't want to be on any instance that federates with the Meta instance(s).