Touche

Typically all horses have no money. What would a horse even do with it anyway. And they don't even have pockets to put in it.

If you've ever seen Euros or Australian dollars, they have a lot of accessibility features such as each denomination being a different size and color and raised print. As per usual for the US, somebody had to sue to get anything done and get accessibility considered, the US bills being the only currency out of 180 to have all of its bills be the same size. The lawsuit started in 2006 and the results might be fully rolled out by 2030. At least one redesign since the decision ignored accessibility for the blind.

Australia has fun names for some bills like lobster and pineapple. Extra bonus: no pictures of slave owners like on the US $1 and $2 bills.

You're very important to the plot of Twin Peaks

Sure beats all that reaping you gotta do after the sowing. Exhausting, the both of them.

Is this better or worse than dousing in Axe?

Why would they...

When Kaiser Permanente

Oh. Of course.

Spain held fast to the practice even as experts debated whether it was a drag on the economy, producing a work force that was more tired and less productive than it could be.

Spain, your culture is getting in the way of wealth consolidation. Get rid of it. /s

What about the slow jerk?

My comments were in regards to the no safe way one in the comment I was responding to, which does talk about college students and adults including a Lucy whose age is given as 24, as opposed to the one about the 16 year old girl that died.

Still remembered by an abuser by his first wife as well as Nicole's sisters and several first responders and 911 operators. There were signs for years. So not that shocking for some.

His public persona was the safe black guy. He actively avoided activism and famously said, "I'm not black. I'm OJ." He was close enough to cops that they handled him with kid gloves when he was arrested for the murders. Compare the slow Bronco chase to Rodney King's treatment 2 years prior. Some communities saw him on wholesome but there was a lot more ambivalence about him elsewhere.

It's always a tragedy when someone dies like that, but that article is full of some really dumb stuff and a lot of moralizing. The Lucy mentioned had frequent hookups where nothing was negotiated beforehand. It's not her fault she was subject to violence and people should talk about sex, boundaries, kink, etc, before participation.

"No safe way to do it": quite possibly. There is risk in many activities. This is why frameworks like RACK (risk aware consensual kink) exist alongside SSC (safe, sane, and consensual). To use a metaphor, driving a car is risky, but we do it anyway while adding safety features to roads and vehicles to reduce that risk. It's impossible to make it completely safe.

“I think it’s a really troubling sign that 50 years ago most people would probably know strangulation was an offence – just like we all know that stealing is illegal,” she says.

Stealing can't be done with consent because then it's just taking.

consequences can be delayed by weeks. It can cause a change in voice, difficulty swallowing, incontinence, seizures, problems with memory, decision-making and concentration, depression, anxiety, miscarriage.

Pregnancy also carries risk for everything on this list except trouble swallowing which is more of a cause. Voice changes from hormone level changes, incontinence from the pelvic changes required to get a baby through there, seizures from eclampsia, "pregnancy brain", postpartum depression and anxiety both exist, and unfortunately miscarriages happen in over 10% of pregnancies. But taking risks for this is considered good while doing so for pleasure is deemed not so.

this is happening overwhelmingly to women by men. If you accept what people will argue – that this is an activity that’s enjoyed because it’s ‘sensual’ – then why aren’t men the recipients more often?

There is a significant difference in the preferences between men and women. This paper suggests ~75% of women prefer to be submissive as opposed to dominant. The sensual framing used is a straw man that requires willful ignorance of kink.

There is a heavy emphasis that porn causes more violent sexual behavior but then has this:

I’ve been with my current boyfriend for over a year and at some point, we had a conversation where I asked, ‘Why don’t you choke me?’ He said he had no desire to.

Some people just aren't into it. It's also mentioned he's not into kinky porn. Also, maybe have conversations about sex and what everybody's into before your one year anniversary.

“When [choking] was presented, you could feel the tension, the internal conflict, in the room, with professionals being unable to reconcile the gap between what they were hearing and their usual sex-positivity.”

This is the most interesting part of the article but they don't go beyond the feeling to get any actual statements from anybody that would be at a sexual health conference. Going from risk to guaranteed harm (if that's the case as opposed to user error) and how that shifts opinions or if there's a divide in spite of that would be fascinating.

As somebody in the kink scene that doesn't really consume BDSM pornographs and knows way too many women that have been subject to sexual violence and domestic violence, I think this is a pretty bad article that conflates kink with those violences.