Truck-kun is just taking him to an isekai in which cats are the strongest class.

No More Mosquitoes

When you want to do an uppest decker.

As somebody who watches, could not agree more.

was is it

Sorry, maybe that was a typo but I don't understand what you meant.

wet noodle ... to fuck us

Can't push rope.

white

He was the candidate that was trying to address environmental issues that are currently disproportionately impacting the poor and POCs.

If you're just looking to be angry at somebody, there's better targets than the guy not in power that's still trying.

Then what's your thought behind blaming Gore for a decision he didn't make and couldn't change?

Given that's David Lynch, I'd say his answer is true in this photo's context and a sign of the undead apocalypse otherwise.

Nope. Go learn about what the Supreme Court ruled on that one. There's no appealing beyond that level.

Apparently I'm the one that has been listening. Your first bolded part is exactly what I think you're saying and are wrong about. Gesunder Menschenverstand roughly translates to common sense, but common sense is used to mean whatever the speaker has no evidence for but insists is true. It is never rhetorically used in good faith. See this for a longer explanation. Since I don't think you're engaging in good faith, I'm not going to continue beyond this.

zero reason for the relational bond to be considered non-exclusive

That's the part that sounded like monogamy should be the prescriptive norm because I would expect it to say exclusive or non-exclusive were that not the case. I'm not saying communication isn't important nor am I saying you are saying so. Just that it seems there's a bias and expectation there and in that first comment about something rubbing you the wrong way. Might not be so extreme as forcing somebody to change, but it's still trying to push norms. That's all. If you find it useful to be introspective about that, great, if not, also great. Thanks for taking the time to clarify for me and have a nice rest of your day.

It was in response to you. What you're saying seems contradictory and reads like this to me: Nobody should be forced to change (unless they haven't defined things in which case absolutely the non monogamous person should conform to what my expectation is).

I don't think it's reasonable to expect somebody to change a major part of who they are because of what you think is normal, not in relationship style, not in anything. I think that's the worse assumption.