zbyte64
Yeah, I'm sure this explanation will renew people's faith in the legal system.
The premise was that there really isn't a historical equivalent. The analogy being shit is kind of the point.
Like I said, hard to find a historical equivalent. Like which side would you compare the execution of landlords? The north paid the slavers restitutions instead.
That is a much better example. I will borrow this for the future. Thank you.
It's hard for Americans to think of a historical equivalent. Imagine if Texas managed to splinter off and join the UK common wealth during the Civil war.
Stop confusing young autistic vulnerable people.
— Date Unknown
I'm old and autistic and not confused by the fact trans women are women. Hope that helps.
Should run against a giant guillotine. Something tells me the guillotine would win the popular vote.
It's CYA boilerplate for breaking the law. Never have I sent a work email that needed to say "as long as it is consistent with the law" because that is already assumed.
After 2 weeks I think they would say something if they had something, and even then...
This dumb ass thinks he has a change to become president after doing nothing substantial to address the devastating LA fires. Does he think he's going to be popular outside California?