51% Attack by wrs369 in c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

It's definitely not ideal though, P2Pool is right there.

51% Attack by wrs369 in c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

No way to know that.

51% Attack by wrs369 in c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Either way, it's not great.

15
51% Attack (miningpoolstats.stream)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink

I guess the operators of Nanopool are really good guys deciding not to do a double spend attack on the network while having more than 55% of the total hashrate 🫠

Why don’t miners want to use the P2Pool even though it strengthens the network and also has great incentives like zero fees with a very low payout threshold?

wrs369

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago