wipasoda

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

so apparently it only applies to companies located in the EU? not operating in the EU, since I'm in the EU and no button

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just cancelled the automatic payment from paypal. Should do the job. If I stop paying, then they can't shove their service down my throat and claim I should pay. That's the plan...

 

Name of game: PacShooter 3D

 

Name of game: PacShooter 3D

 

Credits to go fucking australian news site adelaidenow.com.au

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

1-3 a range? So that means: None, All, AND Abort? But that's contradicting.

I'm using a relative fresh install of manjaro gnome though, I never installed this ivpn package before

 

reading "Build Files Exist" seems to suggest the package already exists, but it's not, I think.

So what is "CleanBuild" and what do the options mean: [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]t Installed

And is meant by (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4) ?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

true but generally speaking one could say he who makes abundance for us all, deserves more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don’t live in a zero sum game though.

Perhaps. I never stated that we are. I was just pointing to a hypothetical world with limited resources, and what then would be most appropriate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there’s no equivalence here.

So you would give menstrual products to people with a uterus but don't say anything about not giving menstrual products to people without a uterus?

But would you? If you do not, wouldn't that make you treat people unequally, in some sense?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

sure, no one is denying that. I was just jumping in on specifics of how that would look like, for example, when giving certain items.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

thats true, then I was wrong. I would however still very much bet my money on the hypothesis that it is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

this is dumb. Either explain what you mean or don't talk at all

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well if you are a reliable source to yourself, I'd say:

Men have more muscle mass than women so they are stronger, particularly in the upper body

And for the other other, the rougher mental, I don't want to play mean or anything, but isn't the burden of proof more on your side? Yes it is certainly possible society molds certain characteristics of men, but that doesn't necessarily mean this particularly trait is - the rougher mental. Don't you agree, right now, in western society, men are less likely to admit their pain?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So for example a physical trauma. Both man and woman get hurt by the same amount, the man would have a higher chance of "shrugging it off" because 2 reason: thicker skin (as you said), and have a rougher mental (or at least want to appear to have), e.g. they want to be seen strong, so they are more inclined to say they are ok

 

...

view more: next ›