Thanks!

Where is the exercpt from?

The article opens up with

Shoppers are switching from traditional product despite little evidence alternative is safer

Yet deep inside the article we read

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) says the key difference is that when nitrates or nitrites are consumed as part of protein-rich foods such as meat, they are converted into chemicals known as nitrosamines, which are thought to be harmful to health

This has been known for 20 years [1], so this is outright irresponsible reporting by the guardian.

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4087738/

If I had to guess, it would be to have an easier time getting intoe the server market.

Being able to develop on the same platform as the one that a program is deployed to usually allows for much lower friction and faster development cycles.

It can also be used to ramp up collaboration with the Linux project, which is useful for getting patches upstreames promptly.

This mean that house prices will fall since fewer buyers will be interested. The question is whether the houses will be gobbled up by private equity or will be allowed to fall down enough for more people to start buying houses to live in

That's exactly my point, there's none and GrapheneOS are not working to create a suitable one yet.

The time to start working on plan B is yesterday

Shaming Google will only work for so long. Grapheme is is doomed to fail as long as it has a complete dependence on Google's whims.

Have they announced the pivot to a non-android platform? Being security-mind it is frankly bizarre they have long ignored the Google dependency as a huge risk for the project.

I don't understand it either, seems like a maintenance burden for not much benefit since the opensubsonic ecosystem is much richer than jellifin's one.

Hopefully it's easy to maintain

How about if instead executives cut down what they leech?

I thought it was illegal for states in the EU to separate spouses. It's the reason EU citizens with the settled status in UK ended up with the right to bring their spouses into the UK, for example.

If a SSID is set to hidden, clients in that network will broadcast the name of the network, so it's usually not hidden at all. I don't buy the argument that broadcasting the SSID means to allow opting in to anything.

https://wifi.report/blog/hidden-ssids-security-myth-vs-reality.html

Max Dangerfield? What were their parents thinking when they named him?