[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago

Only 15% 🤨

[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

It’s sad how consumers have zero rights when it comes to digital content. Companies can retroactively make changes, removing content legitimately bought by consumers with no repercussions. I get “not owning” but for a company to collect money for services provided and not actually provide those services will never not astound me.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

“I’m sorry ma'am but could you please remove your jacket from the seat? It’s obstructing the ads and we have a very clear policy about that”

🙃

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I take spellcheck for granite.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Right! Google acting like they are losing billions a month due to adblockers when in reality it’s like .2% of their total profits and they STILL foaming at the mouth.

🖕

[-] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That’s why no one outside Google wants it. Apple said no. Firefox said no. There’s a reason. WebRTC is shit. It leaks too much just for a small convenience.

And yeah, browsers don’t need my USB ports thanks.

This move was what hurt VIA as they moved to the API exclusively. So the only native apps are just electron wrappers 🤷‍♂️

Edit: Looks like Mozilla said yes after all heavy sigh: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WebUSB_API

[-] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago

Mullvad gets my vote as the goat. I’ve tried Proton and I get half the speed. No port forwarding is the only issue.

[-] [email protected] 47 points 2 years ago

Why? It’s not guns and bullets killing people, it’s 3D printing 🙃

[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 years ago

This is not good. I don’t get how people still have good faith in big business. Here’s what’s going to happen, we will be moving towards a pay for service WITH ads. And data mining.

It’s not one or the other here. People somehow think it’s either a) “pay for the service” OR b) “have your personal data raped and parcelled out to the highest bidder.” It’s not. It’s not either a or b, it’s either b or a AND b.

So I have to pay to be tracked?

And you know once everyone acclimates to the new pricing, it’s going to be “hey we are adding a new plan for $9 that has ads and all the telemetry. Oh, we are also raising the rates.”

The real problem is the entire company is rotten. I don’t understand why people think a pay wall won’t make that the case.

[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 years ago

Apple knew it too. Even without pressure from the EU’s upcoming laws around USBC, they knew we would all riot if they clung to Lightning. iPads, Macs, have all moved on.

Just. USBC all the things. Let me die in a world with one fucking cable. Please. Can we at least do that as a society?

[-] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lmao, no. Google is out of their minds. Apple has zero interest in controlling browsers or ads.

https://money.cnn.com/2017/08/31/technology/business/apple-net-neutrality/index.html

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ultratiem

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago