[-] test_@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago
[-] test_@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

By that logic, we should still live under monarchies today.

[-] test_@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago

Well put, but at that point is it even surplus value? Loosely speaking, if they perform necessary labor in the supply chain, and they're paid a fair rate (money to live on, not get rich on), wouldn't their wage count as part of the cost of production?

[-] test_@lemmy.ml 5 points 13 hours ago

Modern capitalist economies are already massively centralized and planned -- see "The People's Republic of Walmart."

Socialist countries fail because they are embargoed, which stifles their economy, which then stifles their legitimacy.

[-] test_@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago

Capitalism is defined by private ownership of businesses.

A socialist business isn't controlled by a private owner (or major shareholders), it's controlled by its workers or by the government (or a mix of both). No one sits at the top and gets to award themself a massive chunk of the revenue just because their name is on the deed, so to speak. That's the difference.

test_

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 23 hours ago