The butler informed me Kinder Eggs don't make a nice pyramid, Lindt doesn't stack and suggested I would offend her ladyship if I tried Heroes.

I have the staff practicing making a house of cards using After 8's, the butler thinks its something those terrible colonialists would try but he sees no other option

I have always had 1 question.

In voyager we see the Borg have thousands of ships of varying sizes and control a vast area of space. Voyager is able to take down spheres and small cubes.

Yet in Wolf 359 a single cube attacks and destroys hundreds of star fleet vessels. If a single cube is able to have that level of effect why didn't the borg commit a larger fleet?

You have the same issue in First Contact, they only commit 1 cube.

Considering how difficult the federation finds holding them back, attacking with 3-6 cubes would seemto assure victory

The other person was just wrong.

Large scale Hydrogen generation isn't generated in a fossil free way, Hydrogen can be generated is a green way but the infrastructure isn't there to support SLS.

Hydrogen is high ISP (miles per gallon) by rubbish thrust (engine torque).

This means SLS only works with Solid Rocket Boosters, these are highly toxic and release green house contributing material into the upper atmosphere. I suspect you would find Falcon 9/Starship are less polluting as a result.

Lastly the person implies SLS could be fueled by space sources (e.g. the moon).

SLS is a 2.5 stage rocket, the boosters are ditched in Earths Atmosphere and the first stage ditched at the edge of space. The current second stage doesn't quite make low earth orbit.

So someone would have to mine materials on the moon and ship them back. This would be far more expensive than producing hydrogen on Earth.

Hydrogen on the moon makes sense if your in lunar orbit, not from Earth.

I think they mean Woolworths.

Fun story...

Plymouth's Woolworths was the largest in the country with the largest revenue (and profit). For 5 years it had no regional manager because no one from head office wanted to trek that far. As a result it was completely ignored and not refitted or supported.

During that period head office made us all do an employee survey. One of the questions was "Do you think Woolworths will still be here in 5 years". The store manager got shouted at because our store of 100 all said "no".

After much consideration we were all made to redo the questionaire, this time without the question.

Just as I left a regional manager was appointed who dictated floor layout changes. Being months from finishing university I told him his changes defied how shoppers acted and would cost the store thousands. He told me I was just a shop worker and knew nothing.

A week later on daily revenue of £10k-£20k (Saturday was £100k) the store was down £50k for the week. Apparently he forced more changes and it got worse.

Everyone I talk to in retail has similar stories, all of it is terribly managed.

Maven has a high learning curve, but once learned it is incredibly simple to use.

That high bar is created by the tool configuration. You can change and hack everything, but you have to understand how Maven works to do so. This generally blocks people from doing really stupid things, because you have to learn how maven works to successfully modify it and in doing so you learn why you shouldn't.

This is the exact weakness of Gradle, the barrier for modification is far lower and the tool is far less rigid. So you get lots of people who are still learning implement all sorts of weird and terrible practice.

The end result is I can usually dust off someone elses old maven project and it will build immediately using "mvn clean install", about half the gradle projects I have been brought in on won't without reverse engineering effort because they have things hard coded all over them. A not small percentage are so mangled they can't be built without the dev who wrote it's machine.

Also you really shouldn't be tinkering with your build pipelines that much. Initial constraints determine the initial solution, then periodically you review them to improve. DevSecOps exists to speed development and ease support it isn't a goal in of itself

The EU keeps attacking the UK through petty vindictive actions like this.

The EU spokesperson clearly knew using Las Malvinas would be perceived as support of Argentina's claim to the island which would upset the UK.

He justified it as the UK isn't a member any longer, so no one was there to object. However in Geopolitics the point of statements is to send a message to the world stage and they knew it would upset the UK.

Considering none of the Islanders want to to be Argentinian and "winning" would be subjugation and possibly genocide of its people. Someone really should point out to Germans and East European's that in their zeal to punish the UK, their leaders have directly endorsed such actions

There is a standard for sharing tweet style information and for threaded type information between websites.

You have software which implements the tweet standard (Mastodon), the threaded standard (lemmy) and both (KBin).

You'll notice some communities will be [email protected] or [email protected], etc.. this indicates they are not local to the website your using and those addresses are KBin instances, its just your website has a copy of the information.

KBin is newer than Lemmy, it has a fairly simple responsive design that works well on mobile. Lemmy has a REST api so its easier to build mobile applications, a lot of people seem to expect/need to access websites via mobile applications.

The key difference is Lemmy is developed by Tankies, they think China's genocide of Ughurs is justified and they administer lemmy.ml.

Engineering is tradeoffs.

A command shell is focused on file operations and starting/stopping applications. So it makes it easy to do those things.

You can use scripting languages (e.g. Node.js/Python) to do everything bash does but they are for general purpose computing and so what and how you perform a task becomes more complicated.

This is why its important to know multiple languages, since each one will make specific tasks easier and a community forms around them as a result.

If I want to mess with the file system/configuration I will use Bash, if I want to build a website I will use Typescript, if I want to train a machine learning model I will use Python, if I am data engineering I will use Java, etc .

Nice out of date dependencies with those lovely security vulnerabilities!

Thinking of Apple kit as Jewelry makes so much sense.

I have a pair of £40 Bluetooth earbuds and recently asked a group of co-workers why they owned Airpods.

They all admitted the sound quality was worse but it has a nifty find my airpod function. Which put me off buying Airpods.

Thinking of them as £200 earrings explains alot. The reason you buy them isn't for a practical purpose but to be seen in them or look pretty (which is entirely subjective).

Its a really immature and niave response from Kev. Information is power, he's chosen to operate without knowledge for internet points.

Meta think there is potential to enlarge their market and make money, Kev's response won't impact their business making decisions.

Kev should have gone to the meeting to understand what Meta are planning. That would help him figure out how to deal with Meta entering the space.

I don't expect he could shape their approach but knowing they want to do X, Y or Z might make certain features/fixes a priority so it doesn't impact everyone else

They basically view the "western" capitalist system as the source of a lot of pain and misery and so "evil". America is viewed as the leader of this system.

Thus a country which pushes back on this system must be good. Brazil, China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, etc.. are examples of countries pushing back on this system or America.

Under this logic the USSR was one of the good guys and so its actions were righteous.

This is how tankies got their name, they supported the USSR invasion of Hungry when the wrong type of communist won power.

Even though Russia is more extreme in its capitalist position, the Russia demand for a multi polar world order and attempts to compete with the USA, make them heroes to many Tankies. They will justify this as Russia is the successor to the USSR.

So you will see Tankies support the Russian invasion of Ukraine. They will often claim Ukraine provoked Russia, that both sides are at fault, Russias fears about NATO justifiy the invasion, etc..

The problem with this world view is reality, Russia has been raping women and children, castrating PoW's, kidnapping children, operating mass torture centre's, etc..

When faced with Russian actions it's impossible to justify them. So a tankie simply declares all of that as "propaganda" and then looks for sources of information that help justify their position (ironically Russian state produced propaganda).