Rclone?

Well, I'm glad. I wouldn't want to engage with someone as condescending and rude as you, either. The less people talk with you the better.

What's what suppose to mean? Discounting his opinion because his username has the word Eskimo in it?

Just because something references race doesn't mean it's racist.

So it's acceptable for AIs to generate these sorts of outputs, as long as they aren't shared online? Sure, the outputs aren't very tasteful, but they're certainly not illegal by any stretch.

Why do you think the government should intervene, and what you would even expect them to do? No laws are being broken.

If you somehow forbid AIs from generating this through a national law just because it's offensive, it'll open to floodgates to ban 1,000 other things that are offensive. Where do you draw the line? Ban this content from websites like TikTok, sure. But it doesn't make sense to regulate this from the AIs themselves.

So you would support government limiting an individual's right to run software on their computer because you don't agree with what the software outputs?

That's absolute nonsense. The entire premise of these machine learning models is that they accept any arbitrary input, you would want to neuter that?

Trump is entirely irrelevant to this, and I'm confused why you feel the need to throw it in. This trend has been around long before 2016.

A community becomes much less diverse when it banishes entire groups of people just because some of their members hold views you disagree with. The community becomes an echo chamber of yes-men.

I'm not taking a stance on politics here, I just disagree with this tendency to defederate groups on the drop of a hat.