solarizde

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Cult of the Dead Cow unveils 'Veilid', "a secure peer-to-peer network for apps that flips off the surveillance economy" in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hey, that were exavyomy thoughts after reading it. Let's speak more clear.

A group use the protocol to setup a Plattform to distribute illegal stuff, child porn, drug marketplace, Warez...

Sure it might be the "bad protocol" I news and people / industry is trying to blame and block it. But because of the decentralized structuring like the onion net it is hard to.

Another aspect which should be thought about is government in repressive countries. Iran, North Korea, China, Russia... Name it.

You could block the protocol but how could it be by design setup to make it actually hard for NGFW to just recognize the package by header and filter it. Didn't check in detail but hope the implement some mechanics to make this hard.

‘Baldur’s Gate 3’ Prepared for 100k Concurrent Players, They’ve Gotten 700K in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Good thing is, it runs flawless on my Linux desktop too 👍 Just one of the best games I played in years. Good it payed out for larian to invest so much time into it. Maybe a good example for others that you do not need to rush a launch.

Can we have some clarification on what "Usage Data" the app collects and shares with advertisers? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I hope there will be a pro version where you can pay to opt out of all ad and track nonsense.

Network in the sands... in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Not happening, because they have filters.

6
NAT Types, Cisco ASA vs others (feddit.de)
 

Hi,

I recently had to deal with a bunch of Gaming Consoles (PS5 + Xbox) in a network. In the past I always go the UPnP route for them to get their "NAT Type 2" (open nat) achieved. Recently we had them sitting on to 1000 Series Cisco ASA with a standard NAT. No UPnP and I was a bit surprised why and how Cisco manage that all the consoles can achieve NAT Type 2 without upnp.

Normally when the console request a fixed port to test the nat capability and is not flexible with that. So external port rewriting not working. This is where UPnP steps in and rewrite. But on the ASA Configuration was nothing else then the default cisco NAT involved and it was flawless.

Anybody with more Cisco experience than I can shine some light on that for me?

thanks

Network in the sands... in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We have a mini compressor ;)

32
Network in the sands... (feddit.de)
 

Hey, I'm working as a Event IT Specialist. Currently doing a event in kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Just want to share the mess sands can do if you do not seal of the rooms properly.

;(

Redditors, how do you like Lemmy? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Still very new here and most problem I have in filtering my main page. If you subscribed to a bunch of feeds it gets quickly very confusing to find things. You can choose top day, which is to long, but not e. G. Active / top last 4h ;(