[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not the case I was thinking about, but here is a similar case:

[translated] Parking in a stupid way can be expensive. In Frankfurt, the regional court has ruled that a car driver must pay for the use of 28 cabs.

[…]

The cabs collected people waiting at the stops and drove them to other stops along the route. This went on for an hour before the car parked not far from a “Please keep enough distance from the track” sign was towed away and the route was free again. […]

When the VGF then demanded 973.13 euros, 25 euros of this was a lump sum for their own expenses - and the rest was the cost of the rail replacement cabs. The court ruled out manipulation by the cab company after hearing witnesses, and the court was also unable to recognize any dilly-dallying during towing.

The car driver did not have any legal grounds for not paying for the cabs, this only went to a court because they tried to accuse the cab company.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Building nuclear power plants is not a science problem, though, it’s an engineering problem. Just because we can harness energy by breaking up nuclear bonds does not mean that we can do so economically, given the constraints under which we have to operate power plants.

And OP never disputed the science anyways?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Yeah it didn’t really become apparent to the public until the Pedo Guy incident in 2018.

This article by his ex-wife from 2010 is pretty insightful, though. Lots of red flags.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

You can install steam on Fedora using an RPM repository. But everyone using the Steam Flatpak will show up as Freedesktop SDK, no matter the distribution. For Fedora-based gaming distributions such as Bazzite, this is the default way to use Steam.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

Amazing! What is left to do now? Orbital Raptor relight and dummy payload deployment? Do they need a new launch license for that, or is the current one (which should be good for similar flights if I understand correctly) sufficient? S31 + B13?

I assume they will want to demonstrate the V2 flap design before attempting a ship catch. They also need the second tower for that, unless the booster can be destacked sufficiently fast.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

TOR exit node IP addresses are well-known. If YouTube wants to, they can just block the TOR network.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

The same amount of JXL gives you more image than JPEG? Also, it supports ridiculous resolutions (terapixel).

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

3 weeks, roughly in line with faster Space Shuttle turn around times

The shortest shuttle turnaround time was 55 days. Almost three times as much as Falcon 9. The fastest post-Challenger turnaround time was 88 days, I believe. After Columbia, the fastest turnaround was around 5 months.

NASA claimed that the shuttle could achieve a turnaround time of two weeks (page IX). It looks like SpaceX is not the only one setting unrealistic timelines?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Ich kann BehaltEarschXC wärmstens empfehlen.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Then the editor, all extensions, language servers, etc. are all running as root.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

shadowtofu

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago