[-] robbbin@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Fair enough. Though I don't know about your point regarding the software tools. The ones I tried had pretty bad accuracy (and were quite resource-intensive to run) So, I felt like the human-tagging way was still the most sensible way forward. At least for now, where there are still subtle cues that give AI-content away once in a while.

59
submitted 7 hours ago by robbbin@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

many channels pretend to be human-made, but are just AI slop.

21
submitted 17 hours ago by robbbin@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

While watching an animated YouTube video essay a few weeks ago, I suddenly realized that both the narrator's voice and the visuals were AI-generated. This was not disclosed anywhere in the video description or credits.

So, I decided to write a little Browser Extensions where users can register the extent to which a channel's content is AI-generated. Feel free to check it out

robbbin

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 week ago