The horse is right in the center, at the end of where the fire lands.
I can see a horse outside the trees in line with the line of fire but what makes you think that horse was the target?
incel
I don't know what you mean by that.
No word confused me, I was confused by you changing the subject away from you being wrong.
I said I don’t care to debate with you or engage any further.
And yet you did engage with that comment.
LOL WTF are you talking about?
They didn’t prevent him from leaving.
As I already pointed out, they did prevent him from leaving. He got up and started to move and then a police officer forcefully pulled him back on to the ground.
Is it pixelated for you or something?
No.
It's pretty visible on my end.
I asked you to show me where and you gaslighted me in response.
LOL you're gaslighting me. I just said I can't see what they're throwing at and you responded by telling me I can clearly see what they're throwing at.
I'll repeat myself: I cannot see what they're throwing the fire at.
have the right is a reason to hit someone
Why is having a right to hit someone a reason to hit them? I have the right to smash my own hand to pulp with a hammer but the fact that I have that right isn't a reason for me to do it.
Now they should have given him a chance to walk away again but that isn't a requirement. They can keep hitting him till he leaves.
So you're saying the police have the right to hit whoever they like for as long as they like, all they have to do is prevent them from leaving the area? That's crazy.
In the first second, someone tries to throw burning gasoline on a horse.
I don't see where that's happening. All I see is a line of fire appearing underneath some trees' canopy. I can see neither who throws it, how, nor what they're throwing it at; the canopy obscures everything.
Are you claiming you can see what they're throwing it at? If so, could you take a screenshot and highlight the target?
They hit him because he’s behind the line.
I don't understand what line you're referring to.
By law they can use force to compel him to move.
But he got up and started to move and then yet another police officer forcefully pulled him back on to the ground. What you're saying doesn't make sense.
In layman’s terms, they can hit you until you leave the area.
Having the right to hit someone isn't a reason to hit someone. The police officer who hit the citizen with a long stick had no apparent reason to hit him.
That's not what I said.
And this is a non sequitur.