ra1d3n

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Trump lashes out after damning report on his close ties to Putin in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

lol, what episode?

Meta fined $102 million for storing passwords in plain text in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

no... just... no.

Ford seeks patent for tech that listens to driver conversations to serve ads in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Starting failed, please call your service partner for assistance.

TIL although the idea that Adam and Eve ate an apple is common, the Book of Genesis never mentions the identity of the forbidden fruit. in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not arguing for or against, just saying that there is no path on deciding what the author meant because we don't even know who wrote it and they are long dead anyway. And there is nothing to study in nature because it was all fiction.

TIL although the idea that Adam and Eve ate an apple is common, the Book of Genesis never mentions the identity of the forbidden fruit. in c/[email protected]
TIL although the idea that Adam and Eve ate an apple is common, the Book of Genesis never mentions the identity of the forbidden fruit. in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago

Of course, and I did not shit on any beliefs. I only commented on the phrasing that you chose, namely "what the fruit was". Even if you were talking about a short story fan fiction this would be the same situation.

The story had dozens of authors and rewrites. There is no correct answer. Possibly some authors and editors would give you different answers. My take is that there is no correct answer to be found and we can't rely on checking facts of the event.

TIL although the idea that Adam and Eve ate an apple is common, the Book of Genesis never mentions the identity of the forbidden fruit. in c/[email protected]
Good question in c/[email protected]
Good question in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry if you got the impression that I am Christian. I am atheist and believe that we have to avoid resorting to the same kind of fantasy arguments that theists use.

That is why I feel that throwing out conjectures as if they were facts is contrary to a sound reasoning necessary to overcome theist thinking.

Thank you for taking time to look up the knowledge that are the basis of your argument.

I remain unconvinced because just the possibility of another meaning does not pose a convincing case for that alternate meaning to be the "correct" one.

The notion that there is a correct version of the story that is different than the current bible interpretation is probably also harmful because it entertains the possibility that any version is correct. But I think knowing the current version of the fantasy story is probably good so you can take it to pieces if necessary.

Good question in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

No, thanks. Your turn.

Immich relies on a third-party service that seems shady to me in c/[email protected]
Good question in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Do you have a source on your claim? Why do you say this when it's completely false? You are spreading misinformation.

Source:

 34 “How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?”

Parthenos Definition 
NAS Word Usage - Total: 15

    a virgin
        a marriageable maiden
        a woman who has never had sexual intercourse with a man
        one's marriageable daughter
   
    a man who has abstained from all uncleanness and whoredom attendant on idolatry, and so has kept his chastity
        one who has never had intercourse with women
view more: next ›