psvrh

Having seen Poillievre, I don't think he will do this.

If he just shuts up about "the woke" and just talks about the price of milk, he'd have this in the bag, but he can't shut up about "the woke" because the kind of people who vote in CPC conventions talk about "woke" all the goddamn time, and he knows that if doesn't go on about "the woke" some opportunistic usurper will shiv him.

I sorely wish the CPC party members had voted for Chong or kept O'Toole. I'd be annoyed about austerity spending, but not worried about fascism.

Considering he's in power purely as a result of catering to the whackjob right that thought O'Toole was too sane, I would not put faith in his ability to keep the whackjobs under control.

It's the old "What's the problem with riding a tiger? You can't get off without getting eaten." problem that comes from courting populism.

Ohio just voted for a convicted rapist and felon who ran the worst campaign in modern history.

I don't have any faith in America at all and the US "heartland" specifically. If Trump told them to cut their own genitals off, they'd do it.

Because Ford needs you angry about bike lanes while he does his 413 land grab.

That's why bike lanes are in this bill: Ford doesn't care about them, they're just a hail-mary to distract for the other measures in the bill meant to get his highway-to-nowhere built and his developer buddies their ROI.

When you realize that a huge amount of the small- and medium-size right-wing media ecosphere is funded by herbal boner pills, you'll understand why this is a thing.

He's doing this to keep eyes off of the 413.

The more "bike lanes!!" ragebait he stirs up, the less people pay attention to the clauses in the act about eminent domain, skipping environmental assessments or skipping the civil engineers that are on strike.

MAPA

Make Polio Great Again

We used to have progressive income taxes that did this.

Reagan, Thatcher and their ilk pulled them because "trickle down, a rising tide lifts all boats, thousand points of light, blah blah blah"

Steve Irwin would want anomalocaris

As we're seeing in the US now, and the in the UK with the ratfucking of Jeremy Corbyn, the owners of the mainstream media are not interested in covering actual left-wing values. Singh isn't great--I preferred Angus--but anything progressive he says will either get laundered by the media, or ignored completely

What just happened with the LA Times and the Washington Post vis a vis endorsing Harris should be a warning sign to progressives everywhere: the media, or at least it's owners, are already in the tank for the political right. It doesn't matter how much you try to be serious or sensible: the mass media will ignore or belittle you, while they throw softballs to the Conservatives.

It's especially an issue in Canada, where media ownership consolidation is worse than it is in the US.

This isn't to let the NDP off the hook: they need someone like Bernie Sanders, someone willing to bang the class-war drum, but what they're getting are consensus-builders who aren't much better than Trudeau et al.

Damnit, missed Skinny Puppy, and now this.

It would have to be an outsider candidate, and the LPC party structure does not do well with outsiders.

If you've ever experienced dealing with the LPC, you can see why: they're primary composed of compulsive board-of-directors members. Every Liberal representative and most of the party and riding executives are all from the same incestuous BoD members. They encounter each other all the time in their professional circles: they're on the committee for this, the board for that, the council for something else, the executive director for fill in the blank. They know each other because they're each other's lawyers, estate agents, consultants and so forth.

They're so socially inbred that it's incredibly difficult for an outsider to break in.

And before you say "All politicians are like this", they aren't:

• the NDP is getting this way, but they're not there yet; with the weakening of organized labour, more of them are from the Director class, but a lot are still union folk and a few are student radicals. They're nowhere near as institutionalized as the Liberals
• the Cons are composed of a mix of small-business douchebags and grifter-ideologues (sometimes in the same body!). It's actually pretty easy to break into the CPC: just have money and be a loud, obnoxious dick; support is something you can buy.
• the Greens are pretty much split between true-believers that don't like the NDP's professionalism, and grifters that are working a green angle for their next scam. Again, easy to break into if you're loud enough. (side note, it's scary how many failed Green candidates pivot to the Conservatives).

Compared to the above, the Liberals place a much, much higher value on consensus and favour-trading, and have a visceral reaction against outsiders.

By Liberal standards, Trudeau is an outsider candidate. What the LPC wanted was a Dionne or Ignatieff.