[-] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago

They literally posted a video with actual victims confronting the government. And told the story of another one in particular. Your video has some guy not personally impacted by any of this talking about what he thinks he saw somewhere.

And what's with the projection? You're the one making claims but not actually providing any real evidence. Maybe it's not as bad as the United States says. But it certainly isn't like the Chinese government says it is either.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I think you made a non-sequitur. They never said anything about that. Simply pointed out how all jobs require knowledge and training of some sort to be good at them. Perhaps in the future you should debate in good faith and not create straw men to push a false narrative.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago

Training is training regardless of how you receive it isn't it? Perhaps you should take your own advice.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You said it yourself. You don't know what you're talking about here. And despite your continuing ad hominem's and antagonism. I will take one last moment to point out that the use of the term is scholarly and meant to be taken in context. And not colloquially or in layman's terms. It was no more man-made than the dust bowls were in the US. Or any of the other droughts and famines throughout the rest of the world in the exact same times. Saying they were man-made is like claiming that all global warming is man-made. It's not completely. But man is making it worse. But we are also in a natural global warming trend. Context is important. Eldritch is 100% of correct in this instance. They've correctly stated multiple times the human activity made it worse. Which is what the scholarly consensus is. Their only major mistake was engaging those who were disingenuous, smarmy, and or bad faith. Same mistake I made

Also, it's not what I think. But thank you for telegraphing your bad faith. The people who wrote the software stack. Literally have stated many places many times stated the reason directly.

I'll side any day with someone passionately espousing the truth, over someone who calmly lies

END ENGAGEMENT

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
  1. For someone uninterested you sure are interested.

  2. Their argument was not adhominem. Wow! They did call out the other person for misrepresenting facts and being disingenuous/ bad faith. But that's not on the same level. One of the mildest ad hominem's possible.

  3. At this point you are as guilty as anyone else about the very thing you're crying about.

  4. No scholars do not agree that the dust bowl or any of the famines in Asia or Europe were man-made. Nor have they ever stated that to be the case. As Eldritch said. They were absolutely exacerbated by human actions. But we're not man-made.

  5. The platform you are crying on exist for the very fact that Reddit is heavily right wing leaning. You are wildly wrong.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

What do communists and socialists have to apologize for? To be clear I know what you are hamfistedly referring to. But it isn't "communists" or "socialists".

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It's not even remotely racist. One cannot be racist by simply pointing out an actual verifiable fact. Beyond a lion's share of CEOs and owners are disproportionately white. Especially when it comes to media companies. And that isn't a racist thing to say that simply an observation. To say that only white people should be CEOs would be raised. You are grasping at straws. Basically seeking and excuse to be outraged. Would it be racist for me to say that most slaves in America were and still are black? Because it's a verifiable fact. Not all were but most were and still are.

I agree you never actually ask the question. Though if you were ever to be honest you would have asked it of yourself. But you aren't being honest. You are just going around the screaming racism at facts you don't like. Quite childish.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

And that’s irrelevant. Racism is racism no matter who does it, and defending racism is still defending racism.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz still exists and is a Democrat. And I think another thing people have issue with. Is that while it's understandable that Sinema and Manchin exist and are horrible. Democrats seem to most often use that as an excuse to not even try. Republicans try and thankfully often fail to do horrible things. But they try. It's one thing to say you support X. It's another to be seen trying to support it. Democrats talk the talk, but most can't walk.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Only if you don't consider the core tenants of capitalism. Clear cut it all burn the rest to the ground. What you missed, steal from its owner to sell it back to them at the highest possible markup. Move on rinse repeat. Fuck sustainability. Most of the LLMs have what they want. Reddit could burn tomorrow for all they care. It being around for others to use and train on only makes competitors to them which they absolutely do not want. Destroying Reddit is a win-win-win for them.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It's a definitive classic slice of the '90s. Throw in some veruca salt to go with it. Also as we are approaching the 30th anniversary of the release they've been somewhat active again.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

oddsbodkins

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF