You still don't understand.

Arguing with me isn't going to change anything. You should be arguing with the people that nominate establishment candidates.

Go ahead, blame me all you want; I genuinely don't care. If you want me to get out and vote, then your neo-liberal, lesser-evil buddies need to be the ones who 'fall in line.'

Every effort you spend in trying to get me to support establishment candidates is futile.

We should be starting at the billionaires and working our way down, but I also don't care when consumerists and neo-liberals get theirs early.

You have more than enough and should not receive even more while others have less, just like the billionaires you’re criticizing.

This is the important part that you're conveniently ignoring. Why should the person with a $400,000 house in suburbia be exempt from the redistribution of wealth while children starve? How much are they really contributing to the world to deserve that?

You mention doctors and dentists, and I'd agree with you. They can keep their assets within reason.

What about everyone else who isn't in medicine? What about the people that aren't easy for you to hide behind to justify your greed and consumerism?

How am I not calm?

I'm glad they're coming for your assets.

You have more than enough and should not receive even more while others have less, just like the billionaires you're criticizing.

Edit: All the people getting mad at this reality are the reason why we have to choose between clintons and trumps. As soon as someone threatens the wealth of neo-liberals, they immediately agree with conservatives.

Greed and consumerism are the worst issues we face as a species. It makes sense most of you will react the way that you do when being forced to acknowledge your contribution to the problem.

Now, who's excited for the switch 2 and gta 6?

This is what nominating the lesser-evil got us.