[-] krypt@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

.. That can go wrong in so many ways though

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

certainly not the first case. maybe to reach the public

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

It can deliver.. your personal information to the states +third-parties

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

since when could search engines differentiate ai content from original?

Obviously they can filter out low-effort content - but llm content that has "value" can rarely be detected unless data poisoning, afaik

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

hehe think Ill pass

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

get out of my head thank you

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There are overlaps - but it doesn't change the fundamental definition of the word.

using words that do not fit the definition creates bias and chaos. in effect you could potentially diminish people affected rape

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

subject at hand was wikipedia, but it applies to any wiki format I guess - just check sources.

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Another take: bending the definitions of words isn't helping rape victims. This is literally NOT rape so in effect you diminish people affected it

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"Nope" to what exactly? you regurgitated what I said - but told us how you misunderstood it

[-] krypt@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago
[-] krypt@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago

growing up I got taught by teachers not trust Wiki bc of misinformation. times have changed

view more: next โ€บ

krypt

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 months ago