I think people didn't vote for Carny as much as against PP. It's a bit sad that he is following the old playbook.

Or like Ukraine in 2022

I concur, it's not false, but it's hard to call it true

from radio-canada.ca

When you include non-profit housing built by others with federal government help, it's more like 3,742 houses.

But it's hard for Poilievre to take responsibility for the 200,000 homes he says were built when he was minister. In the 2015-16 fiscal year, 194,461 homes were built in Canada in total, including by private developers.

Better article

Poilievre pushed back at Singh for not letting him answer the question and insisted that 200,000 homes were built during his ministerial tenure.

Both figures aren't entirely accurate. Singh's claim that Poilievre only built six homes as housing minister refers only to non-profit community housing units built exclusively by the government in 2015. When you include non-profit housing built by others with federal government help, it's more like 3,742 houses.

But it's hard for Poilievre to take responsibility for the 200,000 homes he says were built when he was minister. In the 2015-16 fiscal year, 194,461 homes were built in Canada in total, including by private developers.

Interviewer: why are you a good fit for valve?

Hoopo: we sold ror before we could make a third

interviewer: welcome aboard!

Man i look at that picture and think: douche bag.

Executives, focus on executives.

Giving someone a bad review is stating ng your opinion, telling others to do the same is more of the same, just like you've done here.

The reason for crunch is oversupply of employees who want to work in the industry or product. This doesn't happen where employees value their time, or there is a undersupply of talent.

Games are not cheap when compared to other entertainment, and they involve the same magnitude of costs, these are businesses and crunch is exploiting talent.

There is a bad actor here, but it's not the customer.

On the face of it this libertarian argument makes sense: mind your own business.

In the real world these non hetero people are murdered, beaten, harassed. So teaching acceptance of these groups is the way that we can get to "just live your life".

Protesting teaching this is the opposite of that: forcing your views on others.

By your own logic you should be rabidly supporting the teaching and acceptance of these views so we can all get back to living our own lives.

Seems like that would hurt Canadian journalism rather than kill the internet?

I read one of his books before i knew who he was, and found although the advice was mostly common sense (if a bit context free) advice, followed by long rants about traditional family's, and backed up by bible. I found myself thinking "what about behaviourism research?", you know there has been progress in the last 100 years. I'm ashamed that the traditional family shit didn't tip me off.

I've found him come up in my google feeds often too, It's insidious.

In terms of convincing your brother about how off this guy is, generally there are how to approach things on line (i.e. you can't always take a logical approach). I've also encountered this kind of thing in my extended family, I've got distant aunts that likely voted for trump, and they are otherwise decent people (i.e. not racist, and supportive).

Working lunch...

Never again