[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

I suspect Macron is much more driven by ambition than Obama was. I doubt he'll just retire.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Macron is particularly young for a president. His political career peaked really quickly, and it can't really go higher. But I suspect he has other ambitions now. Retiring so early doesn't make sense for someone who's driven by ambition.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

It's really easy. If you don't know, don't make claims. You got this.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

A bit besides the point, but it is pretty crazy to me that we're moving towards a world where if you create by yourself, you're outcompeted, but if you use AI like everyone else, you own nothing.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

I would say your biggest issue here is needing precise decimal point computations and using imprecise data types. Any software that requires precision in the decimals needs to use types that are made for precise decimals. No floating point error.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

Are you sure it's not a problem specific to your headphones or your phone? Unless you've got some sort of prosthetics/pacemaker or something like that your torso should definitely not be causing interferences.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

Again, I didn't support anything else than the decision to recognise the state of Palestine, I have no idea what you're trying to argue with me about

[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As funny as the comic is, I am convinced that it will never get to that point, because an asshole with a thirst for power will always exist and be stronger than a bored asshole. Therefore war will keep, as it has always been, being motivated by power.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

I'm just confused as to how that is not common knowledge. The country I speak of is France, and we're not exactly known for our excellent maths education.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not at all. There is many ways to rationalize time, nothing is settled at all. The "settled theory" you talk about would create paradoxes, if time travel is ever made real. And paradoxes don't work well with reality.

There is actually a fairly common way to rationalize time that is the opposite of what you're describing: Time is entirely a construct, there is no past, no future, only the present. Take away all of humanity's memories and the past doesn't exist at all.

There's also an understanding of time that says it only goes forward, making time travelling to the past impossible.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

iglou

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago