people then concluded that FROST is harder to exploit in real-world scenarios than in the lab

What happens if there's an extra 4GB of stuff laying around?

https://arstechnica.com/google/2026/05/no-google-hasnt-changed-chromes-local-ai-features-its-just-as-confusing-as-ever/

A jeep renegade I rented did ok

You must've gotten a good one.

Try the c++23 standard. There's been a lot of cross pollination. Contrived example follows:

#include <format>
#include <numbers>
#include <print>
#include <string>

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
    double pi = std::numbers::pi;
    std::string fstr = std::format("{}, {:>.2}, {:>.5}, {:>.10}", pi, pi, pi, pi);
    std::string h = "Hello";
    std::string w  = "World";
    std::println("{}, {}!", h, w);
    std::print("This won't have a {},", "newline");
    std::println(" but this will add it."); // Add a newline.

    // Can't put a non-constant string as the first argument to
    // print or println so they can be checked at compile time.
    std::println("{}", fstr);
    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

Choosing here to reply because I agree with you about the fine motor control, and I also agree with @9tr6gyp3 about being able to read historical documents (roll credits).

One argument I'd bring up in the whole cursive/shorthand debate is whether there are any other languages that have glyph sets that have already been described with Unicode that would be just as fast as shorthand? I'd also want to consider the ease of doing OCR on the documents for digitization. I don't see how shorthand would be good at either of those things.