hfondmanager

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

simplex TOS:

We reserve the right to remove such links from the preset servers and disrupt the conversations that send illegal content via our servers, whether they were reported by the users or discovered by our team.

Poberezkin is DOA. Dont't try to simplify your privacy by using federated platforms. You will be pawned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

do you really want this guy in your kitchen?

"p2p was DOA"

sucker.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I sent you a PM.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I think he wanted to point towards agorism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

We already missed you. Where have you been 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

works fine today. my inet cx is sometimes shaky, sometimes non-existent. i'll come back later.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

this looked like a chatroom [=meeting] but nobody there... or should i use it to send you a offline message ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

wizardswgtu2ovor7r2esg3cxdpt7tv4nrugi32lldv53zmtonbz6sid.onion # draws liquidity upon users wallets from localparticl.com

I loved it. Its one of the few alternatives to commercial swappers. .onion was under flooding (ddos) attack though. 2.2% slippage. The code is based on BSX (basic swap dex) AFAIK. Used small amounts. Else, Haveno recommended, but be prepared for higher slippage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

xmpp:[email protected]?join

tx. seems to work. *** [hidden] is now Online: xmpp:[email protected]?join

Edit: meeting time?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

There is even a more political answer. To resist indoctrination the most powerful way is to organize. Organization is difficult even under best of circumstances these days. F2F networks may be an option.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I am actually glad you bring this up. You almost give the answer yourself, because RS is not a federated platform.

Thinking inside the dichotomy of censor-or-not i agree with you. But it is possible to step outside this box. In RS you don't have one entity maintaining a blocklist, but every user maintains a whitelist of 25-50 friends. You wouldn'd accept a pedo as a friend, do you? And I suppose you wouldn't want people of bad character to maintain a blocklist FOR YOU either.


It might be a new concept to some influenced by the current zeitgeist promoting antisocial behaviour that friendship must be earned. Avoiding this efford, taking the easy way out and delegating responsibility to a distant authority they have no vote in, however, makes people into a disconnected mass very much powerless.

RS might look retro, but under the hood enables democratic and trusted relationships which are under constant attack by social engineering these days. Imagine being locked down during the next virus and confined to reddit 24/7 and other "social" media. How would you feel about that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›