My Pass desktop app (which shown an offer for Proton Duo) does not have such option. But the frequency of the popups does not bother me significantly and it is sometimes useful. I am Unlimited user.
#Issue no longer happens:
OP is here. I do not know why, but now several times Pass remembered my settings. I suspect that I have used password for the 1st time to login Pass app, before I remember only scanning a QR code from my other device. Maybe that prevented the issue described in leading original post.
There you can find private Monero exchanges: https://kycnot.me/?categories=exchange¤cy-mode=or¤cies=xmr
There is several feature requests for this already, you may upvote: https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/issues/9063
Here is an idea what one can do to reduce seeding of a high peer count torrents:
- if you have some paused complete torrents, make sure to label these to reflect the reason for pausing
- unpause all complete torrents
- disable limit of number of actively seeding torrents (queuing) to make all torrents actively seeding (this will update seeder counts, longer to wait = possibly better?)
- select to display only Seeding state torrents
- sort all according to the Seeder count by clicking the column header
- select all with high amount of seeders (lets say 10+) by clicking first one, holding Shift key, click last one), right click and set them label "High seeder count torrents tmp paused 2025-04" and then pause these torrents.
-> You end up seeding only low seeded torrents. After several months or a year, you can repeat the process.
Thanks, though note this:
Exolix: "Users must undergo AML/KYC procedures" source: https://kycnot.me/service/exolix
Trocador: "Trocador's partners may require KYC checks and monitor transactions" source: https://kycnot.me/service/trocador
Haveno Reto mainnet official repository https://github.com/retoaccess1/haveno-reto
Haveno Pay by mail docs: https://docs.haveno.exchange/the-project/payment_methods/Pay_By_Mail/
Ok, so spending received XMR within 15 blocks (block time seems to be 2 minutes, so half a hour) is too early and spending every 6 months incoming payments in one single tx to my secondary wallet i suppose is too long time.. hmm, that is all quite complicated, I can't asses/compare these times (30 minutes vs 1 month vs 6 months) significance of the impact on anonymity. But thank you.
don’t use a churn output with an unchurned output
You mean that the churning by sending from my wallet to this same wallet(i can also say account or sub account of the wallet) (sending to self) just part of its ballance, will result in churned and non churned outputs in that wallet and these will be joined together if i later (after a week) send a big transaction (or wallet sweep) causing my previous churning be pointless? Maybe in this case is better for simplicity to always churn (part or full balance - i do not know if there is any benefit in sending in parts or in full) to second account within my wallet (instead of sending to self/same address) to prevent this. And i will be sending XMR to a third parties only from that secondary account?
Thanks, I see that the cross-posting works like this: "In order to cross post, I need to first create the post in one community, then after I create the post, I can click the two nested squares icon under the title of the post (with the pop-up text “cross post”) that shows up on mouse-over." https://lemmy.world/post/354611
I assume that you mean to receive XMR on own wallet 1, wait for example one week, send to own wallet 2, wait a few days and then spend it (for example in an e-shop)?
According to @[email protected] [email protected] suggestions, i assume that to improve this, i can split the first transaction between my wallets into two payments (hours or a day delay between each) and each sent to different wallet of mine, then making sure i do not send these two outputs later into same wallet of mine, which would compromise my anonymization attempt? Is this split into 2 payments doubling the difficulty to trace the payment?
The method described in this whole post of mine can be considered very unlikely to be traced by any government in the next decade? Thank you
Thanks, I would like to be able to understand how big improvement would be to send the same or similar amount to secondary wallet of mine when comparing to direct sending mentioned by you. I think that i want above average protection, but i am unable to estimate impact (on TX traceability) of 1,2 more transactions of similar amount between my wallets and i am not enough technical to read and understand tens of technical pages of the Monero whitepaper.
Some of your questions may be answered in the topics:
I need to do how many Monero transactions between my wallets before i break the trace?
Sweep/churn my Monero balance more or less often to improve anonymity?
Maybe you should edit your post and explain in greater detail what is "instant exchange", how you would use it, which data you would provide to them.