Are there still any email providers that offer free anonymous registration? by gammaray in c/privacy@lemmy.ml
Government Surveillance on Chinese vs US made phones by gammaray in c/privacy@lemmy.ml
[-] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

How do you know information is going to China?

"Why is your phone in airplane mode?" by gammaray in c/privacy@lemmy.ml
[-] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

You might want to look into Matrix.

It doesn't require any of that bullshit.

House boosts military budget as Pentagon extends failed audit streak to 30 years by gammaray in c/news@lemmy.world
[-] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

The legislation garnered the support of 149 Democrats. Just 3% of Democratic voters want to increase military spending, but 70% of House Democrats just voted for an increase.

This is a big reason why I'm not loyal to the democrats.

Can we make federation less dependent on domain names? by gammaray in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[-] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I was also considering something along the lines of option 3. I'm not sure of a foolproof solution, even DNS has the potential for imposters and being revoked.

Can we make federation less dependent on domain names? by gammaray in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[-] gammaray@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Thanks. This is a little complicated to wrap my head around. Is this already implemented and we just have to toggle it, or is this something that needs a special/unreleased version of lemmy in order to activate?

57
Can we make federation less dependent on domain names? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by gammaray@sh.itjust.works to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink

It looks like some issues may arise if/when an instance's domain name changes. Is there any way we can change federation so that we don't need to rely on such a central point of failure?

gammaray

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 week ago