[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the internet would never lie to me

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

these are definitely not the words of a cybersecurity prodigy, i can tell that

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

bang should be a schedule 1 drug, it's the worst thing i can imagine putting in your body lmao

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I literally stated it in the comment. It's clear I was talking about providing kids the food they need to develop properly and not suffer from malnutrition.

It's not about "ham sandwich worse than nothing" it's about the fact that you're taking people's shock and complaints, and immediately going to use these "ham sandwiches" to deflect from the issue of kids' lunch debt being legal in the first place. And many of your comments under this post are just "actually it's not technically the child's debt". You're presenting parents not sending kids in with barely-meals as the problem.

The issue to focus on isn't "the parents". The blame often isn't even on parents. The blame is on conservatives, on our society, on people who rail against the basic welfare that every civilized, developed, first-world country has.

As far as everyone else is concerned, you're just trying to make excuses for the right causing our country's dysfunction, and you're trying to defend the existence of school lunch debt by using parents as a scapegoat and saying they're the ones that really cause this.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yea idk why you have downvotes you're literally just describing capitalism. Has no one seen others volunteering for positions when other people get paid to do the same thing?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"Poker-themed roguelike"? That sounds... interesting

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some people in my family line (a long time ago mind you) had "ÿ" in their surname, it came from a Russian name with "Се" (or maybe it came from the Polish counterpart spelled with "Sie"?) which they spelled with "Sÿ". Apparently the letter was used in German writing occasionally around that time period. I thought that was pretty interesting.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

the second one

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tbh I don't know why people say Blahaj instead of Blaahaj. The second is the "correct" way to differentiate Å and A if you don't have diacritics. I would think it would be spelled "AO" instead since it's literally just an A with a lowercase O on top, like how German vowel letters with umlauts (Ä Ö Ü Ÿ) are spelled with an E at the end (AE OE UE YE) when you don't have diacritics available (since umlauts originated as a lowercase E above a letter). Or like how in Spanish the "correct" way to write Ñ without diacritics is to stick an N at the end like "NN".* But who knows what goes on in the minds of Swedish people... I'm pretty sure most of them don't even know that you're allegedly supposed to write "Å" as "AA".

*fun fact: the tilde was previously a lowercase "N" above a letter used in Latin & post-Latin Romance languages to replace a following nasal "n/m" after any letter (e.g. Latin "Manu" -> "Mãu" -> Portuguese "Mão", Latin "Rationes" -> Portuguese/Galician "Razões"/"Rações"/"Rasões", Latin "annus" -> Spanish "anno" -> Spanish "año") but it has been reduced to only the letters Ñ in Spanish and Ã/Õ in Portuguese

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Taxation in the US:

  • Steals from the poor
  • Does so for the benefit of the rich

I don't see what's hard to understand

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

score approval voting (multiple points for each candidate allowed)

view more: ‹ prev next ›

current

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago