For smashing things
How do you know what's it supposed to do, if no one actually wrote that down, other than
As a person.
I would like it to work
So i can do the things.
To be fair, at least that's something...
Or maybe for testing the documentation is the code. The code does this, write a test that accepts it does this.
I like the concept of describing things in scenarios and having data objects embedded in the scenarios. I think gherkin if a bit too restrictive, the same way user stories are, but a more natural verbose scenario that was parameterised with variables tied to actual data makes it explicit what is supposed to happen and what data the system will consume, create or manipulate.
E: there is of course other types of documentation available
How anyone can trust these animals absolutely bewilders me.
Not useless at all, this is why there is so much shit code out there.
It full implies, document and test your fucking code people!
Amount of money in the status quo with oil + petrodollar shenanigans
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/russell-brand-sent-car-schoolgirl-30957932
The age of consent is 16 in the UK, Saville was also a necrophiliac, and that access to hospitals was used for that, so maybe the BBC seen this as pretty tame...
What in the ever loving fuck!
https://www.cop28.com/en/schedule/responsible-yachting-today-tomorrow
catch22
0 post score0 comment score
Ooooo you got me there. Aren't you clever.