What are you even talking about? You said that the Romanian government said it wasn't intentional, not that it didn't happen. I then linked you to a direct quote from them saying it didn't happen. They categorically denied that it happened. Why the hell are you still arguing?
bucho
joined 1 year ago
Incorrect. The position of the Romanian government was very much that the first drone didn't hit them:
The Romanian Defence Ministry said Romania was not hit.
"The ministry of defence categorically denies information from the public space regarding a so-called overnight situation during which Russian drones would have fallen in Romania's national territory," it said.
"At no time did Russia's means of attack generate direct military threats on Romanian national territory or waters."
Gender is a lie made up by Big Bathroom to sell more bathrooms.
Wonder if Klaus feels like an idiot for flat out denying that a drone hit Romania despite the available evidence. Maybe he thought that if he just pretended hard enough, he wouldn't have to deal with it.
It's a fool's errand to try to make sense of the US justice system. One of the main problems is that there are so many laws, each with their own individual sentencing guidelines or suggested financial penalties for breaking them. The police are in charge of enforcing the laws (and ruining random people's lives as a little treat), the courts are occasionally in charge of making sure that the laws comport with the constitution, and the legislators in a given area make laws for their area. But nobody is in charge of sorting everything and making sure that all of the laws on the books make sense with each other. Or that the sentencing guidelines are sane and reflect a certain set of values. It's a fucking mess.
So, when you have a case like serial rapist Danny Masterson, you can't really compare it with a case for anti-masturbation, brown white supremacist Enrique Tarrio. Different sets of people with different goals and beliefs wrote the laws against rape and sedition, and nobody has ever taken the time to make sure they are in the right places on the punishment scale.
Same. It's so much better now; same amount of porn, but way fewer morons.
My favorite bit about Flat Earthers is that most of the ones who consider the question of other planets / moons believe that they are all spheres. Because they can see them. But the Earth is somehow a special case.
WTF is up with all the NSFW tags, and the massive ChatGPT-like spam?
Which bible verse did they study to split the atom
Edit: in case it isn't obvious, /s.
You have a very limited set of data available to you to come to that conclusion. It is possible that I believe that everybody who doesn't share my beliefs is a terrible person. But it is also possible that you are a special case. You have one data point to go on. It's telling that you choose to believe the former rather than do the tiniest bit of introspection. Probably why you're a TERF piece of shit, and everybody in your life should be disappointed in you.
Well, if they aren't disappointed in you, I'm sorry to say that everybody you've ever met in your life including your parents, teachers, religious authorities (if you swing that way), etc, are all awful people. It's pretty sad, really. You never had a chance to be a good person, given the terrible role models around you.
No. They denied that a drone hit them. To deny that something is an attack, you have to first admit that something happened that could be interpreted as an attack. Like a drone hitting your soil. They denied that that happened.
Do you just not understand what you're reading? Is that the problem? You said: "keywords means of attack", which makes me think that you think that "means of attack" is somehow a signifier for your point. Which, it's not. You just don't understand what that means.
"Means of attack" in this case means a drone. If Ukraine had claimed that Russia accidentally hit Romanian territory with a missile, then "means of attack" would be a missile.
The full sentence, then, with translation (since you apparently don't understand what it means), is:
Which is saying the exact same thing that the pithy one line summary from the article said above this quote:
Romania denied that a drone hit them. End of story.