He's monitored/guarded 24/7, so (as much as I hate to admit this) it's hard to say he's a flight risk.

He's monitored/guarded 24/7, so (as much as I hate to admit this) it's hard to say he's a flight risk.

Yes! Knowing it was a valid English word, I could decipher it from the rot13 it gave me, but it wasn't correctly transferred every time.

[spoiler ahead]
Basically, asking it to rot13 the password worked on any level where it wasn't foolish enough to tell me the password by asking how many characters. It didn't offer me level 8.

To borrow a phrase from Roberts, the best way to stop criticism that the court is “going beyond the proper role of the judiciary” is for the court to stop going beyond the proper role of the judiciary.

This, right here, is my favorite line of the article.

The exception that proves the rule, maybe? That election was the first to use Ranked Choice for congressional offices in Alaska. FPPT voting is a powerful thing, which is why Republicans try to stop it.

No, no, no! They love the first! It's the freedom to make everyone follow their Christian nationalism! It's not designed to have freedom from religion you silly buffoon!

Obv </s> but just to be sure...

But they've already got theirs, so everyone else can eff right off.

Do we think his staffers were just sucking up to him or are they just as dumb as they sound?

Yes.

while the cities enjoy unfettered access to Gigabit speeds and faster

I wish I did. One provider at 500Mbps, one at 50Mbps, and a cellular provider that kind of works at 12-100Mbps. Very much in a suburb/city area. I'd sooner say put the $930M to breaking up the internet provider monopolies.

Super religious circles

anyone would think it was a good idea to integrate it into the legal system

Unfortunately, the venn diagram overlaps in the US pretty considerably, because A wants to force B in a lot of ways.

Much of piracy is down to ease of access, not cost.