[-] brisk@aussie.zone 7 points 6 hours ago

What a dramatic platform to say nothing of substance on

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 25 points 17 hours ago

Because anti-trust has not been enforced this century, with the exception of Lina-Khan's work as the FCC director.

Companies have been pushing the boundaries further and further for decades, with almost no push back.

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Not enough brass, though

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago

If I were designing a representative democracy from the ground up, I would have only one house with full proportional representation. I'm not compelled by any of the arguments I've seen in favour of multiple systems side by side like we currently have, they generally seem to sacrifice democracy in favour of convenience or "stability"

I'm strongly of the opinion that "government" as applied in the Australian political system (ie, cabinet) should not be a single party, but nominees collectively agreed by parliament (assuming ministers are necessary).

Going from where we are now, the lower house needs to change. Multi member electorates would be great. Otherwise, the smallest meaningful step we could take would be transitioning to a Condorcet method of counting lower house votes. That wouldn't even require us to change the ballots!

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 4 points 5 days ago

I'm not much of a musician, but I've used MilkyTracker for some chiptune work

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago

There are two contradictory headlines (both with stats to back them up!) posted within an hour of one another.

I couldn't comment on which is accurate or if it's dependant on perspective, I just found it amusing.

The school thing is irrelevant, it was just between them on the feed.

17

The government brought in the preventative detention regime in late 2023, after the high court ruled indefinite detention unlawful, resulting in the immediate release of 92 people, including refugees and stateless people, who could not be returned to their country of origin. A larger cohort of more than 300 in long-term detention were ultimately released as well.

In November 2024, the high court found the subsequent monitoring regime, which included ankle bracelets and curfews, to be unconstitutional.

The government then passed amendments, making it so only those that “poses a substantial risk of seriously harming any part of the Australian community by committing a serious offence” could be subject to such

conditions.

17
submitted 2 weeks ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone

The report found that Morrison’s failure to detect misleading advice from the department was caused by social services and human services departments both failing to advise him and other ministers that new laws were required.

113

The attack on Iran was “clearly a violation of the ban on the use of force under the UN charter and international law, which is the linchpin of the international order since 1945,” he told Guardian Australia on Sunday.

“Domestic criminal acts like the IRGC’s interference here, of course, are not armed attacks which would somehow justify military self-defence against Iran.

“You may not like Iran, you may not like what it does, but that doesn’t justify an aggressive armed attack on Iran.”

36

With less than three months to go until the federal budget, you are going to be hearing a lot more about tax. It seems that something is finally going to be done to fix the capital gains tax, but already conservatives are working to give the richest another tax cut.

The new shadow treasurer, Tim Wilson, has followed up his line that unemployment is too low by arguing high-income earners need a tax cut – because, poor dears, they are taxed too much to bother working.

6
submitted 1 month ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone

There is no single template for the women and girls who found themselves trapped in ISIS controlled territory.

141
submitted 2 months ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
34
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by brisk@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone

We rely on myGov, but can we trust its code?

Millions of Australians use myGov to access essential services like Medicare, the ATO, and Centrelink.  The myGov Code Generator app is one of the options for enhancing myGov login security.

But is it actually secure?  Services Australia, the agency who publishes it, claims it is.  But when I requested the app's source code under Freedom of Information (FOI) laws, Services Australia refused, arguing that releasing the code would help "nefarious actors" and compromise security.  In other words: "Security by Obscurity".

True security requires transparency. Hiding the code prevents independent experts from auditing the system for flaws.  It also denies secure access to government services for people who do not live in the Google or Apple "walled gardens", or to people with disabilities and culturally and linguistically diverse cohorts who cannot use the app as designed, but who could use modified or translated versions.

A merits review at the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART)

After years of waiting for the OAIC's review of Services Australia's access refusal decision - which they punted on due to the technical nature of the matter - I applied to the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) for review.  In this proceeding I will challenge the government's claim that hiding public, publicly-funded software is necessary and in the public interest.

This is not just a fight about source code—it is a fight for the right to know how our government's essential digital infrastructure works, and for the right to make it better for everyone.

The government will use taxpayers' money (probably lots of it!) to employ top legal counsel to defend their position of secrecy and control. I need your help to level the playing field in this fight for transparency, security, and freedom.

8
submitted 2 months ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/28756788

Please excuse Sky News link, they are the only source I've found so far that actually includes the letter in full.

SBS Article

The Guardian Article

9
submitted 2 months ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/adelaide@aussie.zone

Please excuse Sky News link, they are the only source I've found so far that actually includes the letter in full.

SBS Article

The Guardian Article

32
submitted 2 months ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
20
submitted 2 months ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
10
submitted 2 months ago by brisk@aussie.zone to c/adelaide@aussie.zone
[-] brisk@aussie.zone 203 points 1 year ago

Reminder that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is made up and the types don't matter

The perceived accuracy of test results relies on the Barnum effect, flattery, and confirmation bias, leading participants to personally identify with descriptions that are somewhat desirable, vague, and widely applicable.[10] As a psychometric indicator, the test exhibits significant deficiencies, including poor validity, poor reliability, measuring supposedly dichotomous categories that are not independent, and not being comprehensive.[11][12][13][14]

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 106 points 1 year ago

Note to studios: there is no amount of potential, unrealised profit that makes it ethical to install malware on another person's computer.

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 166 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The inquest heard that due to shortages, only Officer B took a body camera that day, but did not wear it for any of the searches he conducted. He told the inquest his priority was “to get out of the car quickly due to the way Bradley was walking”.

If we ever want to be able to have a just police force, this sort of thing needs to be considered sufficient evidence of intent to commit a crime. Either you have a body camera on, or you are a civilian, not a cop

The whole the article is incredibly damning; an illegal stop, a "proactive policing" policy which can so obviously only ever lead to injustice, violation of the right to walk away, targeting without sufficient evidence, police lying about callouts on the radio

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 132 points 2 years ago

"You may not reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble any portion of the output generated using SDK elements for the purpose of translating such output artifacts to target a non-NVIDIA platform.,"

This is literally a protected right in multiple countries, so um...

🖕😎🖕

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 95 points 2 years ago

The FTC argued this would happen, it's the court that swallowed Microsoft's tripe. This is the FTC's "I told you, bro!"

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 124 points 2 years ago

The US Textbook industry single-handedly justifies the existence of Library Genesis (if it requires justification)

view more: next ›

brisk

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago