Because anti-trust has not been enforced this century, with the exception of Lina-Khan's work as the FCC director.
Companies have been pushing the boundaries further and further for decades, with almost no push back.
Because anti-trust has not been enforced this century, with the exception of Lina-Khan's work as the FCC director.
Companies have been pushing the boundaries further and further for decades, with almost no push back.
Not enough brass, though
If I were designing a representative democracy from the ground up, I would have only one house with full proportional representation. I'm not compelled by any of the arguments I've seen in favour of multiple systems side by side like we currently have, they generally seem to sacrifice democracy in favour of convenience or "stability"
I'm strongly of the opinion that "government" as applied in the Australian political system (ie, cabinet) should not be a single party, but nominees collectively agreed by parliament (assuming ministers are necessary).
Going from where we are now, the lower house needs to change. Multi member electorates would be great. Otherwise, the smallest meaningful step we could take would be transitioning to a Condorcet method of counting lower house votes. That wouldn't even require us to change the ballots!
I'm not much of a musician, but I've used MilkyTracker for some chiptune work
There are two contradictory headlines (both with stats to back them up!) posted within an hour of one another.
I couldn't comment on which is accurate or if it's dependant on perspective, I just found it amusing.
The school thing is irrelevant, it was just between them on the feed.
Reminder that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is made up and the types don't matter
The perceived accuracy of test results relies on the Barnum effect, flattery, and confirmation bias, leading participants to personally identify with descriptions that are somewhat desirable, vague, and widely applicable.[10] As a psychometric indicator, the test exhibits significant deficiencies, including poor validity, poor reliability, measuring supposedly dichotomous categories that are not independent, and not being comprehensive.[11][12][13][14]
Note to studios: there is no amount of potential, unrealised profit that makes it ethical to install malware on another person's computer.
The inquest heard that due to shortages, only Officer B took a body camera that day, but did not wear it for any of the searches he conducted. He told the inquest his priority was “to get out of the car quickly due to the way Bradley was walking”.
If we ever want to be able to have a just police force, this sort of thing needs to be considered sufficient evidence of intent to commit a crime. Either you have a body camera on, or you are a civilian, not a cop
The whole the article is incredibly damning; an illegal stop, a "proactive policing" policy which can so obviously only ever lead to injustice, violation of the right to walk away, targeting without sufficient evidence, police lying about callouts on the radio
"You may not reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble any portion of the output generated using SDK elements for the purpose of translating such output artifacts to target a non-NVIDIA platform.,"
This is literally a protected right in multiple countries, so um...
🖕😎🖕
The FTC argued this would happen, it's the court that swallowed Microsoft's tripe. This is the FTC's "I told you, bro!"
The US Textbook industry single-handedly justifies the existence of Library Genesis (if it requires justification)
What a dramatic platform to say nothing of substance on