Calling well-earned criticism of economics anti-intellectualism is using the composition/division fallacy.

Most people's lives have been affected for decades by Chicago School of Economics voodoo nonsense, that's where much modern criticism is aimed.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_in_a_Time_of_Debt

• https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/jul/11/how-economics-became-a-religion

• https://pluralistic.net/tag/chicago-school/

It's this: https://www.newsweek.com/james-comey-deletes-post-depicting-8647-after-backlash-online-2073031

James Comey posted a picture of "8647" (get rid of Trump) spelled in shells.

I mean, they are also responsible for making news a for-profit enterprise, which has arguably ultimately killed it.

Many algorithms aren't even doing that in good faith, instead substituting in their low-cost contract cover bands as often as they can.

Bruce Schneier has been saying for something like 25 years that technological advances always favor attackers over defenders.

Please, no. We don't need more myopia from politicians.

I really like the tiling window support in Pop_OS!'s Cosmos desktop.

Maybe, unless the replacement is immediately worse based on who seizes control. It's the devil you know vs the one you don't.

This was also my recent experience on PopOs!

So it sounds like you don't believe progressive taxation works. I guess that's an understandable viewpoint. But if you think complexity is the problem, I have a hard time accepting your assessment of me as naïve. People that want simple solutions to complex problems are showing the lack of sophistication that defines naïvety.

I'm in!

Annie Linux, but sadly it doesn't exist yet.