Yes, that's my question. The comment before me made it seem like only 1 person lives in one house.
bandarawan
joined 1 year ago
Completely right. Here is a German article saying "it was badly planned". https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/europa/ukraine-verlauf-gegenoffensive-gady-100.html
What are the demanding of Russia?
Why one fifth? Why should only one person live in one house? Or do they mean "enough houses for 4,6million"
Not sure what your point is. But the exit of the 1% nuclear we had left was not a green decision.
But it sure was used to bash green actions, yes.
Ukraine's military collapse is probably closer than most people understand; the reason: demographics
Okay. Thousands of new soldiers a day (so ~1 million a year) is more than enough.
Sure. Infinite growth isn't the same as having a minimum positive growth.
Ukraine's military collapse is probably closer than most people understand; the reason: demographics
Interesting. Of course Russia will have the advantage in the long run. 140 vs 40 million people is just too big of a difference. (and then you need to remember that a lot of people flet Ukraine).
However, if Ukraine really gives everyone guns to fight, Russia needs more soldiers at the front.
What are the current news on conscription? Are there more Russian soldiers to be expected at the front soon?
I wait for the day anti green politicians in Germany stop pointing at the alleged biggest polluter in the world (China) saying: "whY shOuLd wE do soMEThInG agAinSt clImatE cHaNGe, if TheY donT foLlOw"?
A lot of coal burning if I remember correctly. They need a lot of heat in winter.
Here is an infinite sequence, always growing, but never reaching the value 1:
0, 1/2, 3/4, 7/8, 15/16, 31/32,...
So infinite growth is possible.
More than one fifth is true, but it is also far from the truth. Venezuela has 29 million people. So if the average is only 3 people per home you can house 1/2.