Ah, I see. They do seem to waffle on a great deal over there.

What's WH?

Really interesting stuff, thanks for sharing.

Add the cop's take as an overhead.

Or just rinse, save some shampoo for tomorrow.

That might be US only, where the companies have freedom to get all the customer's data and do with it as they will.

What if the country in question decides to let them in, but without the proper documents, with the implicit goal of getting their labor for cheap? I think the principle of POSIWID applies here (the purpose of a system is what it does). In other words, the system is/was working as intended, and illegal immigration was desired.

Chinese style censorship is more consistent, though. No one is making up rules on the fly.

rectified

I see what you did there.

This is Trump we are talking about, so musk's title is probably more like "Presidential diaper changer".

But under the settlement, Lyft will have to explicitly tell drivers how much their potential take-home pay is based on typical, instead of inflated, earnings. It has to take tips out of the equation, and it has to to clarify that it will only pay the difference between what the drivers get from rides and its guaranteed earnings promise. Finally, it will have to pay a $2.1 million civil penalty.

That last part is like having to put a quarter in the swear jar.