attributed

I have repeated this argument elsewhere but I can say it again. When you are running a mainstream instance, you should be obliged to uphold every dissenting voices. Otherwise you will end up effectively censoring free speech. Your argument is extremely narrow minded

Censoring for differences in political opinion is an obvious violation of freedom of speech. If you don't like them, censor them for yourself. Why are you advocating what others should or shouldn't hear?

That's what I thought. Being a man is overall harder

Different rules for different people

It's funny that the bigoted ideology that architectured 9/11, Islam, is very well alive and kicking

While the ideology of slave ownership is dead or dying. Call it Christianity or white supremacy

In other words, Islam is the greater danger

When it comes to doing, everybody craps their pants off

I agree with that. I'm not some lunatic tranny. Just saying that namecalling black people, trans people and other minorities, just gives them more fake heed to ban you. If you stay respectful while criticizing them you would earn more support imo

Although making fun of them is important, it should not be your mainstream image. That's the problem with the non-left in America. As a non-western person, the left seems much more accepting than the right, even though they are clearly on the wrong

Can't you express your view without degrading a community?