What might be better than turning it off is a onboarding screen that shows you how it works and you test it while the install completes.

There's a million more important things it could show you instead

It can conflict with some programs. A lot of modern design programs make use of middle click drags to move around a canvas.

That caused problems for me and it took me days to realize it was middle click paste causing the issue of all these random segments of text appearing all over the canvas.

It was also annoying to disable. I was using Chromium at the time and you simply cannot disable it, even by disabling it in Gnome. I had to use Firefox exclusively when using that design program since at least Firefox has a hidden option to disable it.

Imagine spending 3+ years on staying mad at GNOME to release the most underwhelming software imaginable.

Shocking, a 3 year old project is not as well established as a 20+ year old desktops. Its feature set is enough to me, but they did release it too early as it is still quite buggy.

COSMIC is very poorly designed, it might be written in the “memory-safe programming language” but it’s clear that they don’t have a design backbone

It looks "fine". I agree that modern Adwaita looks better, but it's not terrible. The default theme is meh, but themes like Catppuccin makes it look nice. There's also missing things like drop shadows and animations, which I believe are toolkit limitations.

They built an entire new desktop from scratch rather than work with GNOME

Gnome and System76 had different goals and UX ideas that were incompatible. Rather than continually patching Gnome and updating their patches to keep working, they decided to build their own thing, that's fine.

I don't quite get why Gnome people see this as a negative. If System76 is a poor downstream, then System76 no longer being a downstream is beneficial for them.

rather than work with GNOME or KDE and in that amount of time

I think that's a good thing in the long run. Gnome and KDE both have a significant amount of technical debt.

One of the things I love about COSMIC is how sanely it's built, following modern programming principles.

• Rust helps avoid memory issues, helping with security and bugs
• A lot of things run as their own processes, which would typically all be running under a single process in Gnome/KDE. So even if something does crash, say the power applet or notifications applet, it won't bring down other components like the shell.
• Clean layout of configuration, data, and state files. KDE is an absolute mess in this department. Gnome is better than KDE, but COSMIC does even better.

So while COSMIC is worse now due to its bugs and lack of features, I think it's built on better foundations. That is, if System76 continues to invest in it. I'm not sure how profitable/unprofitable it is for them. My guess would be unprofitable.

Check dmesg logs and SMART check the drive.

I had two crucial drives that would go read only, some sort of firmware bug I guess.

Yes. They were very concerned about head to head comparisons because the tools for measuring FPS and stuff works differently.

The bar is meant to be very minimal and not distracting.

It takes up space, sure, but it's close to the minimal height while still having easily readable time up top

You can purchase used electric cars too.

No, it's a limitation with swaybg so they created a tool that doesn't have that limitation.

The for argument is basically the following

• Wayland as a protocol was designed around CSDs, protocols for SSDs came years later
• Having the client control the CSDs simplifiies things for the compositor and apps
  • The compositor has less things to implement and test
  • Modern apps tend to prefer CSDs anyway since it provides more flexibility, very common on MacOS and Windows
  • It's difficult to coordinate things between the client and compositor.
    • Something that annoys me about KDE is that they do this headerbar look where the top part of the application will match the color of the the titlebar. However, the top part of the application is drawn by the application and the titlebar is drawn by the compositor. But when the color changes (such as going from unfocused to focused), they do not update at the same time, so for a frame or few the top part of the application is a different color than the titlebar. That wouldn't happen under CSDs.

[Blockchain] technology is neutral. People make it good or bad.

Sure, maybe. But you're making it clear you're in the bad camp too when you're announcing this with NFTs.

Yes. However, it's still very notable that distros like Ubuntu have gone from 40+% to under 10%.

kurtjmac was one of the first (I'm not sure if the first) to start the journey. His journey is notable because he did not use the nether or any glitches and built up a community over those 14 years.