[-] artwork@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Thank you... Freaking awesome, and ineffably magnificent... no words... πŸ’«

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

- But most students, in my experience, claim less severe ailments, such as ADHD or anxiety. And some "disabilities" are just downright silly. Students claim "night terrors"; others say they "get easily distracted" or they "can't live with others". I know a guy who was granted a single room because he needs to wear contacts at night. I've heard of a girl who got a single because she was gluten intolerant...

- At Stanford, almost no one talks about the system with shame. Rather, we openly discuss, strategise and even joke about it. At a university of savvy optimisers, the feeling is that if you aren’t getting accommodations, you haven’t tried hard enough.

Source

I do not consider this fair, or adequate, regardless, of course. If you are healthy, you must be proud of it. It's pure disgrace, regardless.

Yes, these people may exploit the system, and probably are proud of it, but this all subconsciously affects self-confidence deeply, morally/psychologically, and it sure comes out soon or late from the mind and heart, from soul, especially if they started at age of tuitions, I believe.

And here, for around 40 years living, working in military and education, I haven't met anyone yet who would actually recover their inner stance enough to not become a fearful and self-disclosed individual, since the ethics border gets shift and blur gradually and permanently. These never find peace throughout their life, and trust no one, including themselves, which is indescribably sorrowful...

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

From Libera IRC channel #bash:

The Bash Reference Manual in the Epstein files is very outdated.
Please read https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bash.html instead.

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Of course, thank you, and I do realize that, but:

  1. I tried selecting sections that where not associated with othe vendors - same result;

  2. Shouldn't it still be allowed to store cookies for the same vendor/domain, without any consent, by default.

  3. There are other means/API than cookies to store consent state in common browsers, including: LocalStorage, IndexedDB, SessionStorage, CacheStorage etc.

52
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by artwork@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Have you ever tried not pressing "Agree" on the cookie consent, at PC Gamer?
It seems impossible - the dialog pops out every single page surfed, regardless.

For example, if you press "More Options -> Save & Exit".


Consent Preview

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I see. The explicit glorifying of a single project instead of the overall idea, technology, effort makes sense.
Regardless...

- So, it seems like PieFed is becoming a real alternative to Lemmy...
- Most of these will also be available in Lemmy 1.0 soon!
Source

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Screenshot on 2026-02-02_08-56-00_Z

// Image source: Video comments

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I see. Thank you for the response, and Oh! Thank you for a statistics reference shared, with the "lot" statistics, actual discussion, and comparisons, and your actual opinion on it!
I.e. Comparisons between personal instance with their locally limited ActivityPub for their own environment/platform, and this - explicit change, which affects absolutely everyone who is in Lemmy, and whispers silently:

- "Private, private, private, private...",
- "Hey... why aren't we a private Community yet? Turn it on, right now!",
- "Let's turn !linux@lemmy.world into a pay-wall membership Private Community with limited number of payment methods, so that only sanctioned/unsanctioned people might actually pay and join! Since, why not? It's just a check in everyone's config! So easy - wait for over8000 Members, and switch from Public to Private, in a second!".
... - "Oh, man... why is Lemmy so empty... Just 2 posts today over 50 Communities I am joined... Is all available in private Communities nowadays?"

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

"Not federated Private Communities" on federated networks as Lemmy, focused for private, transparency, and accountability?
What is the main point of it again, sorry?

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Thank you... very much, @puckpuckpuckow@lemmy.world ...
Not only some are tired of this LLM/"AI"... but the "two kinds/types"? My dear... is it just "two persons" on this planet, world, universe... they consider?

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Wonderful day! πŸͺ

Ha-ha! Of course, it's okay to add emojis (or even emotes (/ o.o)/) to an accountable CV for responsible job to get trusted for! πŸ˜‚
Especially those for security πŸ”’, privacy πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈ, transparency πŸ‘β€πŸ—¨...

If I would look at such CV in search 🧭 for a trusted developer πŸ‘©β€πŸ’», sys-admin πŸ’», manager πŸ“œ, accountant πŸ’Έ, and for military forces ( -.-)7, sure thing the pretty pictures would increase the feel of trust to the level of the outer space and beyond!!!1 πŸ’ͺ

Oh! And why just LinkedIn? Perhaps to enhance the sense of accountability, some would want to add emojis to some documents, including employment contracts, Banking issues, weaponry certificates, and passports! Let's make it shine in sparkles! ✨

Look! LOL! OMG! This is the colleague on fields we need! They have these lovely emojis! Let's hire them right now!
Since, "There's no crying in Special Forces!"

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Hurrah! Congratulations, dear Duke Nukem, and the Developers and Artists, the Community!

Balls of steel, right Sam?
~ Serious Sam's Bogus Detour

[-] artwork@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Ineffably magnificent... of course... no words...

view more: next β€Ί

artwork

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 months ago