amanwithausername

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No way, that's awesome! I'll give it a try for sure!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hmmm never used xubuntu per se, but XFCE already seems like a good option for a low-spec computer. You could probably chip away at the resource usage some more by building your own desktop environment around a bare window manager, but honestly at this point the gain is negligible. If anything, you might want to look into tiling window managers just because they can offer a much more fluid and customizeable desktop experience as opposed to floating WMs. I'm using BSPWM right now, but considering switching to wayland with hyprland or qtile.

As for choice of distro: Not sure if NixOS would run well on your machine -- my homeserver is also a pretty low-spec computer (dual-core Intel Atom), and nixos-rebuild switch takes ages to run. Otherwise, go for Debian Testing if you want stability, Void if you want to not have systemd. There's also Devuan, which is basically Debian without systemd, but iirc it's not as popular as Void. But honestly if xubuntu works for you, then it's fine.

Also, some miscellaneous tweaks for improved performance:

  1. IF YOU BOOT FROM A HARD DRIVE REPLACE IT WITH AN SSD! Solid-state drives are pretty cheap nowadays, and the upgrade from hdd to sdd is the single biggest performance improvement you can do for an old laptop
  2. If on x11, disable compositing. On XFCE, there should be an option for it somewhere in the settings. If on a bare window manager, simply don't install any compositing manager (picom, xcompmgr, etc.). The downside is screen tearing and no proper window transparency, but it does put less strain on the CPU.
  3. Consider looking into a custom linux kernel? I boot linux-tkg on my main laptop and it gives some pretty good performance improvements. But I'm not so sure whether it would translate well to a low-spec system.
  4. Again, not exactly a performance tip, but consider formatting your boot partition as btrfs. Apart from all of the other cool features that you get with BTRFS, transparent file compression can, in some cases, be a win-win-win situation: less disk usage, faster file access, and longer SSD longevity. On low end system tho it may actually be the case that the CPU is the bottleneck as opposed to the disk, so transparent file compression may actually slow things down. Here are the settings I use for btrfs on my laptop (thinkpad with a core i7-5600U, mSATA solid state drive): lazytime,noatime,autodefrag,compress=zstd:3,discard=async,space_cache=v2,ssd. Again, not sure how well these translate to a low-end system, you should do your research.
  5. If your system supports uefi, consider using EFISTUB as opposed to Grub. Much faster boot times. Another option is to add two efi entries: one for EFISTUB (and have that be the default), and a second one for Grub, for when you need to change boot options or boot into recovery mode.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I personally use KeepassXC on my laptop and KeepassDX on my phone, and keep them synchronized with Syncthing. Works great, and no need for third-party / cloud storage!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm curious, how do you manage passwords in your web browser? Do you use the keepassxc browser extension? Or just copy-paste from keepassxc manually?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nice, I have the exact same setup! Do you sync it to your phone too? What app do you use on your phone to read the database file? (I myself use keepassdx)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any reason to use the original Keepass over KeepassXC? Also, tip for anyone using Keepass or KeepassXC: there's an Android app called KeepassDX that supports the keepass database format, so you can keep your passwords synchronized between your computer and phone by simply syncing the database file with Syncthing. No third-party server required!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It still blows my mind that with nixos, setting up and continuously renewing an ssl cert is literally just two lines in the config file. I use nixos on my homeserver, thinking about switching my laptop to it too (currently Void linux).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My idea is that if I stay on the oldest supported version for as long as possible, that would help me avoid evil changes in new versions, since the news would have gone public before I update. You bring up a good point about security updates tho. How relevant is it to browser extensions? Has there been malware out there that specifically targets vulnerabilities in extensions? Just casually doing git log | grep -E 'vuln|crit|secur|bug' in two extensions that I use quite extensively (pun intended), I don't seem to find any security-related commits.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

In Mac Os you can actually pop open the plastic covers to reveal a pretty advanced control panel that feels oddly like Linux, but you have to do it very quietly, or else Steve Jobs will rise from the grave and slap you across the wrists with a metal ruler

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Your guess is as good as mine haha

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Transcript:

[Miracle of the word wide web meme template]
"Thanks to the miracle of windows subsystem for linux..."
"...I can use the Linux terminal from the comfort of windows"
[Computer monitor showing windows update screen]
"Marvelous"

 
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I remember seeing a version of this meme where for all distros the "users" was in plural, except for gnewsense, where it was just "user", implying that Stallman is the only one who uses it XD

 

This isn't meant to "mean" anything btw, just a stupid pun.

 
 

It seems every now and again some popular Chrome or Firefox extension decides to "go evil" seemingly out of nowhere.

Stylish got caught logging browser history, The Great Suspender turned out to be spyware, and, in the case of "get cookies.txt", which was endorsed by youtube-dl, apparently the user is not the only one "getting" the cookies.

In most of these cases, it seems that trustworthy extensions get sold off to some shady third parties, or the developers just "turns evil". This got me wondering: would it be an effective security precaution to simply disable updates for browser extensions? i.e. to download the extension manually from the developer, instead of relying on chrome web store / firefox addon catalogue. It wouldn't help much if the extension you're using contains malware now, but it would prevent malware being installed in potential future updates.

So, what do you guys think?

view more: next ›