I don't think they actually have. They've even implied the opposite at times. https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/25/sam-altman-warns-theres-no-legal-confidentiality-when-using-chatgpt-as-a-therapist/
"Well, someone needs to run Vichy Canada!"
-Pierre, probably.
My bad, it seemed like you were implying that the 38.7% of people who signed the Forever Canadian petition and the 30% who are (or at least were) for Alberta separatism were the exact same group.
You think the people who signed the Forever Canadian petition are all people who want to leave Canada?
Pretty much, yeah.
To your first question, not really. The entire point of the notwithstanding clause is such that it cannot be challenged by the court. To your second question, yes.
Sure, but the Canadian government isn't the one who put out the ad. The Ontario government did. Why does Carney have to apologize for something that Ford did?
The streaking was so bad on mine that I bit the bullet and just replaced the windshield.
Thomas Lukaszuk certainly could be lying about the reasons why he submitted the petition. He was the Deputy Premier of the PCs after all, so, there's that.
The question from the petition that the Alberta Prosperity Project is proposing is "Do you agree that the Province of Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province in Canada?" which is currently being held up in the courts, while the Forever Canadian's currently ongoing petition is "Do you agree that Alberta should remain in Canada?"
There is currently no ongoing petition where signing it indicates a desire for Alberta to leave Canada.
She's closer to the Wildrose portion of the party in terms of the merger.
In the sense that she was the actual leader of the Wildrose party.
Warehouse
0 post score0 comment score
To the point that it's a meme.