@Zagorath damn I missed it. I love T90
TerrorBite
@LainTrain That would be @[email protected]. The blog itself is also federated at @[email protected]
[tagging @vzq @programming for Mastodon->Lemmy federation]
@Lynxtickler ahh, I misunderstood what you were referring to. Didn't realise you were talking about JSON Schema and not the JSON syntax itself.
It's the other way around. The YAML schema supports JSON because YAML was designed as a superset of JSON.
Oh absolutely. I can think of several situations where that wouldn't work well or at all, for example, a switch statement that sets up variables to be used in the rest of the function.
Also, good luck using
switch
without anybreak
s, but I'm guessing that's not quite what your teacher had in mind.
The teacher, probably: “You must always put a switch
in its own function! Then use return
at the end of each case.”
@btaf45 in my case, we as a team could have done that, because we didn't have management dictating how we did anything. It was our choice to do what worked for us, and it was a valuable tool for dealing with whatever got thrown at us.
Now I'm working in a different place that dictates Agile and Scrum to be done Their Way, on top of a project that's largely waterfall-like to begin with, and I'm starting to see why people say it doesn't work.
It works, BUT, only when you're using it as the right tool for the right job and not when management decide to misapply it as a hot new planning methodology.
@btaf45 @mspencer712 The whole point of Scrum is to use the retrospective to stop doing what doesn't work and start doing what does.
At one point, when my team's workload changed to less-timeboxable work, we threw out the entire concept of sprints and just used kanban instead, and stayed like that for a year. We still did retrospectives on the old sprint cadence though.
@Zagorath I'm down in Canberra now.