TerrorBite

joined 6 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@Zagorath I'm down in Canberra now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

@Zagorath damn I missed it. I love T90

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@LainTrain That would be @[email protected]. The blog itself is also federated at @[email protected]

[tagging @vzq @programming for Mastodon->Lemmy federation]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

@Lynxtickler ahh, I misunderstood what you were referring to. Didn't realise you were talking about JSON Schema and not the JSON syntax itself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's the other way around. The YAML schema supports JSON because YAML was designed as a superset of JSON.

@Lynxtickler @canpolat

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

@trk Coming from Mastodon, I have already learnt that it's not worth putting up with the negatives just to get a few extra users.

@Zagorath

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Oh absolutely. I can think of several situations where that wouldn't work well or at all, for example, a switch statement that sets up variables to be used in the rest of the function.

@zib @UnRelatedBurner @programming

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Also, good luck using switch without any breaks, but I'm guessing that's not quite what your teacher had in mind.

The teacher, probably: “You must always put a switch in its own function! Then use return at the end of each case.”

@zib @UnRelatedBurner @programming

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@btaf45 tagging @programming so that this federates properly from Mastodon to Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@nous That's a good way of putting it!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@btaf45 in my case, we as a team could have done that, because we didn't have management dictating how we did anything. It was our choice to do what worked for us, and it was a valuable tool for dealing with whatever got thrown at us.

Now I'm working in a different place that dictates Agile and Scrum to be done Their Way, on top of a project that's largely waterfall-like to begin with, and I'm starting to see why people say it doesn't work.

It works, BUT, only when you're using it as the right tool for the right job and not when management decide to misapply it as a hot new planning methodology.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

@btaf45 @mspencer712 The whole point of Scrum is to use the retrospective to stop doing what doesn't work and start doing what does.

At one point, when my team's workload changed to less-timeboxable work, we threw out the entire concept of sprints and just used kanban instead, and stayed like that for a year. We still did retrospectives on the old sprint cadence though.

 

Holy shit they kicked

they kicked the tankies out of @196 🔥🎆🏳️‍⚧️

view more: next ›