Stiffneckedppl

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

"Oh no you di'int"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I miss Ginni! She was so much better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Which is redundant since J.D. Vance himself is a joke.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The altercation came moments after Trump criticized major media outlets for what he said was unfavorable coverage and dismissed CNN as fawning for its interview Thursday with his Democratic rival Kamala Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz.

It appears the man was going after members of the press, not Trump.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Followed by a J.D. Vance joke...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Calm down, J.D.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Raskin is a Democrat.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Re-read the comments. No one argued that nobody uses terms of endearment. The argument is that using given names doesn't need to be normalized because it's already an extremely normal thing...and that the abnormal behavior would be someone actually getting upset that their SO called them by their given name.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lol, ok buddy. Have a great day. 👍

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Never using real names ≠ not using pet names.

I also have never met a couple that never calls each other by their given name. That doesn't mean those same people never use pet names.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (6 children)

So my question is, if they reverse judge Cannon's decision to dismiss and reinstate the case, is the case back in her hands or is there a way for them to get the case reassigned through this?

Not that any of it will happen before the election now, thanks to her...but would be great to see her removed from any future proceedings.

view more: next ›