[-] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 2 points 22 hours ago

Yuck, SNW was all the nostalgia tripping I could take. More boldly going, please!

[-] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It certainly lowered my enthusiasm for SFA s2, knowing they went hard with a cliffhanger finale... That show had a lot of spirit and promise, I wanted to follow those kids through the academy.

SNW — I know I'm in the minority here, but I couldn't get into the show's tone, and especially the way it's leading doggedly towards TOS, literally checking boxes for each continuity item. It feels like a dead man walking, and even more so now. This is actually the first time I've looked forward to a Trek show ending.

In terms of wall to wall far out aliens, Earth's future, Rose all giddy traveling with a new Doctor, and of course Cassandra, my mind went to The end of the world, but that was probably too in the nose.

I quite agree about The beast below, also a companion's first space jaunt, right? And boom, Amy get to walk away from Omelas, but it's future UK in space. Can we just stick to Moffat episodes?

We may both rag on the silliness and threadbare stories in this show, particularly in this episode — but I don't need any more detail on Jack Harkness turning into a giant head in a fish tank. You die and revive enough times, that's the end result 🤣

I think that's the sort of gaps that could never be filled satisfactorily on screen. They're much better as a space where viewers' imaginations roam wild instead.

[-] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I was going to rewatch this, but reading @ 's rundown soured the memory of it a bit. It's an episode I've watched a bunch, and it has some elements I really like:

  • The cat nun nurses, terrific makeup, crazy concept!
  • The face of Boe, another wild and well executed idea.
  • Cassandra! Probably the most iconic ~~trampoline~~ recurring villain in the early show. Even now, fans post cookies and embroideries in her likeness, even though she's visually and thematically horrible!
  • Let's just add the Duke of Manhattan, too. What a throwaway character. And I like how his neck grates when he moves.
  • And I like Chip, for some reason. In this bonkers rogues gallery, he's just a dude in scrubs with some paint on his face. Somehow that, a silly gait and the earnest, wide eyed acting is enough.

The allure of the body swap has worn off the more I watch this, though. Not a lot of actors can pull it off, much less so when the person they're impersonating is Zoë Wanamaker at her peak of campiness.

By now when I think back on this episode, I remember Billie Piper complimenting her own arse, and skip to the one with the werewolf instead. Oops, spoilers for next week's throwback discussion!

This is honestly not a terrific story as a whole — VS has already pointed out the biggest pratfalls — but at least it's so full of wacky characters and running away from human guinea pigs, you won't have time to say "that's not how medicines work".

Oh, so jealous. TBF, it's still hilarious on fourth and fifth watching.

[-] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Barclay was evading real life conflict and pressure for sure, but also doing erotic power play with holo-versions of his crewmates... I think that last part was an early taste of our current deepfake porn reality 😬

Either way, Lower decks made it clear that into the 2380s, cleaning out the holodeck biofilters was still the worst job on a starship:

People really use it for that?

Oh yeah. It's mostly that.

There may be a joke flying over my head here, but Barclay only appears, having rather consequential holo addition issues, two full seasons after the Bynars' upgrades?

I dunno, it's almost too neat and tasteful, isn't it? I checked out Matt Ferguson's other anniversary posters, and they have a lot more going on visually.

Sure, this movie's tone is very different, but still.

Looking forward to it. The Chinese scifi I've watched hasn't been great, but I'm hoping this will serve as the gateway I need to start the original language Three body problem series... No pressure!

Hm, interesting. I'm a bit wary of science fiction's ability to grapple with "AI" while techbros crowbar their glorified Tamagotchi into anything with a chipset — promoting the products with allusions to scifi that the eager marketers clearly haven't understood.

But I'll give this a watch on your suggestion that it has Star Trek elements, or vibes 🙂 As long as it isn't "The measure of a man" with Grok in the defendant's seat...

Call me an epicurean, but

and

3

When I click an external link from inside the app, Blorp replicates appears to open a new instance of my default browser, including all of its current tabs. It's slightly confusing because closing the tab I opened from some thread means I now have two identical browsers open, but one of them is Blorp 😉

I realise I'm just supposed to hit the back button to be returned to the app UI, but I'm new to Blorp and very familiar with my browser. You see how habits win out over what I rationally know I should do...

Did I miss some setting to open links in an internal, single tab browser instead?

13
"Thanks anyway" (www.radiotimes.com)

Carole Ann Ford, who played the Doctor's granddaughter Susan in the early seasons of the show, and cameoed again in the most recent series, offers her thoughts on the current hiatus.

She's a cheerful lady, but it's hard not to read some disappointment between the lines that her historical return to the show was all but cut, with slim chances for a do-over. Ford turned 86 on 16 June.

13
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by SiliconAvatar@startrek.website to c/doctorwho@startrek.website

BBC director-general Matt Brittin has announced that 550 of the planned 1,800 to 2,000 job cuts at the corporation will be taken from BBC News and TV and radio-related roles.

The 57-year-old has also announced the BBC is to axe programmes and cut content spending by £80 million, and added it would “review our broadcast TV channels and radio network portfolio” as more of its audience moves online, while attempting to sustain “output” and “audience value and impact”.

The BBC has not indicated which programmes would be axed under the plans.

[…]

In response to the announcement, head of media and entertainment union, Bectu, Philippa Childs, said it is “far from ideal” that the cuts are taking place at the same time as the BBC’s charter renewal.

She said: “I’m not sure how you can make informed decisions about the long-term future of the organisation when it will be in a substantially diminished place at the end of the process than the beginning.

[…]

“The charter renewal must put the BBC’s funding on a secure, long-term pathway or it risks death by a thousand cuts.”

So that's fairly dire for anybody hoping the BBC can shoulder a show like Doctor Who without substantial external funding.

10
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by SiliconAvatar@startrek.website to c/doctorwho@startrek.website

Big caveat up front, I have no illusion that this was ever planned out, or that it's ever going to be made. I just connected some dots from Eccleston's season to our current mess. I do think that if the BBC had Pete McTighe make a 15 minute special along these lines and put it on Youtube, the fans could rest easier and the next production team might start on a blank slate.

To summarise, the last couple of seasons had a convoluted arc concerning a companion's parent issues. She was saved as a baby through time travel intervention, but not without a lot of temporal disturbance in the process. In fact, babies have been a throughline in both Ncuti Gatwa's seasons, a pattern that culminates in the Doctor rupturing the Time Vortex in order to save one child's existence. For just a probable moment there, that child is his own. Succeeding in his mission, the Doctor is then replaced by somebody looking suspiciously like Rose Tyler.

  • Church.
  • Baby.
  • Rose.
  • Temporal paradox.
  • On what could be considered the Doctor's Father's Day.

Bring on the Time Reapers to sterilise the wound in time! That's why the Doctor regenerated into this face, à la 12 looking like Caecilius from "The fires of Pompeii". She needs to channel Rose as a catalyst to heal the reset 15 did to save Poppy. Besides, where Pete sacrificed himself to sort the timestream out, this time around the Reapers are attacking the Doctor and their police box. And the Doctor's current face has a very special relation to the TARDIS' living heart.

To be fair, the rest of the story doesn't really matter, this is only meant to resolve the Billie Piper twist of "The reality war". It doesn't fix fan quibbles over the Timeless Child or the Doctor being half human on their mother's side for a hot minute in 1996. Pretty much everything other than that latest regeneration cliffhanger can be ignored or picked up upon by future writers. So end this minisode on a regeneration without showing what happens next, or just leave it open ended.

Now, would I love for Susan to pop up for no other reason than to ease her "grandfather" into the credits crawl, and a future season where neither actress are seen again? Maybe an exchange to echo the Seventh's exit monologue to Ace at the end of "Survival"? Absolutely, but this could well be a one hander between Piper, some 2005 archive footage, and the janky old low-poly CGI monsters from back then.

[made a few edits for clarity(?)]

view more: next ›

SiliconAvatar

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 weeks ago