Pagliacci

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Why would this be treated any differently than googling things? I just googled the same prompt about hiding food that's mentioned in the article and it gave me pretty much the same advice. One of the top links was an ED support forum where they were advising each other on how to hide their eating disorder.

These articles are just outrage bait at this point. There are some legitimate concerns about AI, but bashing your hand with a hammer and blaming the hammer shouldn't be one of them.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think too often we get caught up on "the game" and try to frame decisions solely in that context.

The reality is that sometimes in politics people hold genuine beliefs, and when it comes to the GOP I think a non-insignificant caucus of them genuinely opposes abortion for various personal reasons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Of course, it's just his "get out of jail free" card to save face publicly when he starts rejecting requests.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He qualified it by specifying it's if you were "unfairly" facing repercussions, which of course means he can deny or accept anyone he wants for any reason that he wants and still claim he's upholding his pledge.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

There's a significant difference between the people rising against their government and the people rising against some of the government on behalf of the rest of the government.

That's what happened on Jan 6th. Those people were launching an assault to support their preferred representatives, they were very much pro-government. Nothing libertarian about it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I think their words are accurate, it's just that their allegiance isn't to the United States of America.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't think he knows how SCOTUS works...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think so, his "X" idea has been around for a long time, he really thinks it's his next big idea. I'm sure people have raised all of these concerns with him, but I doubt he's listening. Tesla, SpaceX, etc. are ideas that he bought, this one is his baby. I don't think he's open to ideas or criticisms on it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He bought the company to bootstrap his idea of his "X" app which he envisions becoming something like WeChat for the world outside of China.

I think it's a terrible idea that's a solution in search of s problem. WeChat works in China because the government literally enforces it's usage. The rest of the world isn't interested in a one-stop-shop for anything and everything.

It's the problem of trying to be everything for everyone. You end up with mediocre or bad solutions for many problems instead of great solutions for a couple of problems. It works when there's no competition, see WeChat, but when there is competition that competition is going to beat you at their game because you're too busy playing a dozen others.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Who needs laws anyways?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Haven't used my desktop in ages, has been completely replaced by my personal and work laptops.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's not the candidates John, it's right wing media and the voters. The GOP has lost control of it's monster.

view more: ‹ prev next ›