39

I was looking through Lenin quotes on the Marxist archive and found this gem. This is exactly how i felt when I was taught Hegel works in philosophy.

Love our diva lenin

[This Post was originally posted in r/TankieTheDeprogram]

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago

there should totally be a liberation flotilla but who will provide the arms, who will fight, who will give them a navy?

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 days ago

why are they cutting people in half?

41

I know times are tough right now, and I know that many of us (me included) are busy with the Epstein files. These files are interesting, and important, but be aware that releasing these files might just be another manoeuvre by the current administration and elite to distract us. There are red herrings in these files as well. Please do not get distracted and pre-occupied.

Venezuela, Cuba, Mexico, Palestine, and plenty more countries are still under imperialist threat or occupation. Workers rights and social security are being played with. ICE is roaming around the streets in the US and already is in Europe (though more covertly). The capitalist elite are playing the game on multiple dimensions. We must resist them.

The proletariat must be organised.

Thus, I kindly remind to get outside and get organised IRL :

    1. Join a party.
    1. Join/support your union/organisation.
    1. Organise consistently and collectively.
    1. Be prepared.

We have a world to win.

[Post was originally posted in r/TankieTheDeprogram]

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 days ago

Thanks for also (re)posting your full post also on here :)

67

[This Post was originally posted in r/TankieTheDeprogram]

Apologies if this is the wrong tag, also I used the google auto-translate function for this article.

I really had to share this with you all.

So as of this week the CDU announced that they want to intensify the fight against left-wing extremism in Germany….

The article states (again it was translated with google translate)

After the attack in berlin, Dobrindt wants to intensify the fight against left-wing extremism.

Federal Interior Minister Dobrindt has announced a strengthened fight against left-wing extremism.

“The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution should focus more closely on this phenomenon, the CSU politician said in Berlin. The agency will be reinforced with additional staff for this purpose. Dobrindt emphasized that this would not lead to a reduction in resources in other areas such as right-wing extremism and Islamism.

At the beginning of the year, an apparently left-wing extremist arson attack on a cable bridge in western Berlin led to a power outage lasting several days in the southwest of the capital. Following the attack, so-called "volcano groups" claimed responsibility. The Federal Criminal Police Office and the Federal Prosecutor General today offered a reward of up to one million euros for information leading to the identification of the perpetrators.”

Anyways I find this concerning since there are hardly any leftists in Germany, so anyone could be accused of being an extremist.

Leave your thoughts below and share the story further.

Article source: (I am sure u can also find other sources covering this topic):

Deutchlandfunk: Dobrindt wants to intensify the fight against left-wing extremism. January 27, 2026.

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 week ago

I once saw a tiktok leftist saying similar shit (though he had a degree in psychology). I did warn him though in the comments that even if the scientific facts are what they claim to be, we still cant fall or use the same rhetoric as the nazis did. luckily he understood.

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 week ago

lemmygrad is wild. I love it.

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 2 weeks ago

My grandma is half-russian half German, but never had the chance to grow up in the Ussr. She was born in Poland in 1933. Its a very complex history, and just that you know my grandma is a commie too. Her half-sister did though. So I do think about it a lot not just because of my Marxists affinity but also because of the family history that still is very much uncertain.

Also my mother (grandmas daughter) grew up right next to the GDR, they also watched a lot of GDR TV Illegally. When I moved to Belgium (we had to leave Germany due to poverty and neo-Nazi attacks on us, im half Italian). I ended up having teachers from the former soviet union even former Olympians. All of them were kind to me, in comparison to my elitist German teachers who only cared about those Germans who's grandparents/great-grandparents were actual nazis

So I think about it the soviet union in a historical, a Marxist and a sort of family related sense, and hopefully imagine how our lives could have been better if my grandmother and mother had the same chances as her sister and cousins/nephews did.

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hi there I studied archaeology and have read half of the book and critically reviewed it in a class. basically in the book he is trying to give a brief history of the earliest stages of humanity. His takes are very liberal, sensationalist and it doesn't take he history of other parts of the world into account. He also tends to mix chronologies up a little, like its not written in a linear order which just further helps to confuse the reader. Also for people who study history, archaeology or anthropology it feels a bit hollow.

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

as someone who studied archaeology just be aware that sapiens is extremely sensationalist

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago

I was just watching Weltspiegel this evening which was so conflating and very biased. They first went like yes trump is bad and all (for the case of greenland) and then they interviewed a "specialist" who was constantly claiming that russia is the biggest threat to greenland and not the actual fact that trump is the main cause in this situation. The rest of that edition consisted out of cuba bashing, interviewing US military trainees in Hawaii (and portraying them as heroic) and really bad coverage on iran. I swear to god it was the most US asslicking bullshit that i have ever seen, and I guess germany is goingto keep sucking trumps dick.

11

[THIS POST WAS ORIGINALLY POSTED ON REDDIT IN R/TankieTheDeprogram ON THE 10TH OF JANUARY 2026]

Hey guys,

I wanted to open up a Marxist (and actually leftist) discussion on the topics of decoloniality, decolonial authors, and decolonial academia more generally. Specifically, I am interested in whether decolonial theory and decolonial academics are politically useful for Marxists, or whether they function as an ideological dead end.

I avoided posting this in the critical theory sub because that space is very libbed up.

As you may already be aware of not all forms of decoloniality are Marxist.

Anyways I hope the questions I provided can open up a discussion on it, you can also add separate discussion points below. This Post should help Marxist and non-Marxist foster a better understanding of an actual leftist perspective of decoloniality.

Discussion questions:

  • Are decolonial academics genuinely contributing to anti-imperialist struggle, or are they using “decoloniality” as an academic smokescreen/vanity?

  • Do academics monopolize discourse while detaching colonialism from capitalism?

  • In some cases, does decolonial academia end up silencing the proletariat, and silence Marxist voices?

  • What are your thoughts on decoloniality?

  • What would an actual Marxist approach to decoloniality look like (both academic and in the IRL liberation movements)?

I would also love to hear people’s thoughts on the following decolonial authors (and feel free to add others):

  • Frantz Fanon

  • Walter Rodney

  • Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò

  • Walter Mignolo (I am aware he is not a Marxist. This might be a good case study for how decoloniality can become politically harmful)

I made an earlier post touching on this topic and postcolonialism, which you can find on both Reddit and Lemmygrad:

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/TankieTheDeprogram/comments/1p51r8t/discussion_decoloniality_and_postcolonialism_in/

Lemmygrad: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/9854938

71
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml to c/thedeprogram@lemmygrad.ml

Hi there everyone, I wanted to create this post in order to document the current evolving situation regarding Venezuela, The Nobel Peace Prize, and the Trumps/Us actions that are currently happening. You can leave screenshots of evidence, talking points etc. in the comments below.

FYI (for those who did not know)

  • Machado is a fed

  • Machado is associated with Yales World Fellow-program, which is associated with Langley (which is the CIA). She was in the class of 2009.

  • Here is more info on her according to twitter user, and host of “Going Underground” @afshinrattansi (please correct me if that guy is reliable or not) He also uploaded a pic of a letter by her to Netanyahu, and a pic of her with George W. Bush.

Current situation (starting from 09/12/2025), obviously the situation predates that date.

  • 10/12/2025 The US seized oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela.

  • 11/12/2025 01:03 AM: US releases video it says shows troops seizing tanker off Venezuela, they boarded the ship via helicopter. The US is claiming that "the tanker has been sanctioned for many years" and that it had been involved in an "illicit oil shipping network that has been supporting foreign terrorist organisations" .Venezuela's government has responded by accusing the US of "theft" and "international piracy", and has previously said it believes the US is actually trying to depose its President Nicolás Maduro. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cy07yk63x80t

Update on Venezuela as of 03/01/2026

•03/01/2026: The United States launched a large-scale military strike against Venezuela, including air and possibly ground operations in and around Caracas, as reported by multiple international news outlets. The Venezuelan government labelled the strikes military aggression and condemned them as an illegal attack on its sovereignty.

03/01/2026: U.S. President Donald Trump announced that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores had been captured and flown out of the country in an extraordinary operation early Saturday, a dramatic escalation in U.S.–Venezuelan conflict.

03/01/2026: Trump stated that the United States would temporarily “run” Venezuela until a transition of power could be arranged, without providing clear legal or logistical detail on how governance would be affected.

03/01/2026: U.S. Attorney General **Pam Bondi said Maduro and Flores would face criminal charges in the United States on longstanding drug-related indictments filed in 2020.

03/01/2026: Venezuelan authorities and state media have rejected U.S. justifications, describing the removal of Maduro and the strikes as kidnapping and military aggression and have demanded proof of life while mobilizing security forces.

03/01/2026: Explosions were reported across key military sites in Venezuela, including Fuerte Tiuna and other strategic installations; Venezuelan Defence Ministry officials pledged resistance, and armoured vehicles were seen in Caracas amid protests.

Late December 2025 – early January 2026: The U.S. had been escalating pressure on Venezuela for months through military buildup in the Caribbean, repeated strikes on vessels accused of trafficking, and naval deployments, which Caracas and many independent analysts framed as hostile acts toward Venezuelan sovereignty.

International Responses: The action drew global concern, with some U.S. lawmakers warning it risks regional conflict, and allied nations critical of the intervention. Venezuela called for a UN Security Council meeting to address what it termed U.S. military aggression.

Sources:

“Why Trump ordered a US attack on Caracas and captured Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro” The Guardian, 3 January 2026.

“Trump claims US captured Venezuela’s president in military assault on Caracas” The Guardian, 3 January 2026.

“Caracas explosions: US attacks Venezuela and captures Nicolás Maduro – live updates” The Guardian (Live Blog), 3 January 2026.

“Trump says US will run Venezuela after capturing Nicolás Maduro” The Guardian, 3 January 2026.

“Venezuela crises live: Trump tells US ‘captured’ Maduro and will run country” BBC News (Live Reporting), 3 January 2026.

“US says Maduro and wife will face trial in America after capture” BBC News, 3 January 2026.

“Trump says US captured Venezuela’s Maduro after military strike on Caracas” Reuters, 3 January 2026.

“Venezuela rejects US military aggression after strikes on Caracas” Reuters, 3 January 2026.

“Live: Loud explosions heard in Caracas as Trump claims US captured Maduro” Al Jazeera (Live Blog), 3 January 2026.

“In photos: US strikes hit military sites across Venezuela” Le Monde, 3 January 2026.

“Timeline: US military buildup near Venezuela and escalation toward January 2026” Military.com, 6 December 2025.

“Venezuela calls urgent UN Security Council meeting to halt US military aggression” Venezuelanalysis, 2 January 2026.

“2026 United States strikes in Venezuela” Wikipedia, last updated 3 January 2026.

I apologize if this is written badly, again the situation is evolving. So I encourage everyone to comment updates and evidence below. Feel free to discuss and comment ur views on the situation.

I am going to use the tag #AllEyesOnVenezuela (sorry if i sound like a lib) on my socials for awareness and to make sure that US propaganda is not dominating the conversation.

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean the main issues with most western-Europeans academics, like Varoufakis is, is that they tend to monopolize the discourse and vocabulary in order to drive a profit for themselves. He will never actually achieve any change, he will just make the conversation around it more exclusive .

[-] Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 months ago

Apparently somebody found this on the ACP-discord yesterday (not sure if its somebody infiltrating the ACP).

62

I have recently made post about reporting any ACP (American Communist Party) infiltrators. Though in this post I want to provide evidence to you all on the Deprogram-Forum, and the rest of Lemmy-grad on how the ACP is deliberately brigading other leftists reddit-subs. The Attached Image is the evidence that this was a planned and organized brigade.

The call to brigade other leftists’ spaces, came from the chairman of the ACP himself, Haz Al-Din (his reddit username is Infrared Show). He posted this call on r/AskSocialists which is now a completely ACP-compromised subreddit. It was then reposted on r/LeftAgainstACP, and this is also how most of us found out.

Current situation Summary:

  • There were many attempts of the ACP trying to brigade leftists’ subs, and also even conservative subs (for rage bait I guess, or spreading more reactionary bs)

  • Many actual leftists made posts about it, and a call to ban them if you see them.

  • Thus far ACP people have tried to brigade or brigaded: r/AskSocialists (successfully), r/Socialism, r/TankieTheDeprogram (unsuccessfully), r/SocialistGaming (you could mostly find ACP apologist on my anti-ACP post in that sub, which are promptly banned).

  • When I searched ACP, in the reddit search bar I even saw that they were posting in r/ConservativeYouth, where the post was immediately removed from.

  • They also actively tried to target r/GenZeDong.

If you want to add more subs that have been infiltrated by the ACP, pls leave them below in the comments section.

The ACP

As a brief reminder the ACP is not our friend, nor are they actual leftists. Jackson Hinkle (among others) founded the ACP, and its current chairman is Haz Al Din. Midwestern Marx is also another ACP affiliated figure.

They claim to be Marxist–Leninist, but many critics argue they are not Marxist at all, instead promoting a blend of socially conservative, nationalist, and pro-authoritarian politics. Essentially Strasserims, Nazbolism. They are Nazis who use the USSR as an aesthetic branding.

They oppose much of what communism has stood for historically: they reject liberal-left “woke” politics, express support for nationalist and reactionary stances. In practice, their activities have centred on online propaganda (TikTok, Twitter), political positioning, and alignment with authoritarian regimes. They also call themselves** MAGA-Communists,** and socially conservative and claim that Marxism is historically conservative.

This is not Marxism, so please report them if you see them.

What can we do?

  • Support your mods in your favourite online spaces by reporting brigadiers.
  • Help inform other leftists , about why the ACP is bad.
  • Support and watch r/LeftAgainstACP for more information.
  • Share or create actual Marxist social media content, so that the ACP cannot dominate the conversation online. Support those creators who are successfully calling them out.
  • Make sure your discord servers have a verification-process

-Get organized in IRL, support unions and actual leftists’ parties.

If you have more solutions pls leave them below

Also this post is not meant to cause mass hysteria, its purpose is to document what the ACP has done yesterday and start a conversation.

Anyway, leave your thoughts, comments, and feedback below.

N.B: I am not going to add links here right now because I am not sure how it works with tracking on this platform, and I do not want to invite the ACP in.

29
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml to c/thedeprogram@lemmygrad.ml

So, somebody recently asked me to do a Marxist–Leninist reading of the conservative-left party Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) the party is currently still operating under that name, though a potential rebranding is expected. I am half German, so I figured I would write a short, factual overview of what the party is, where it comes from, and how it positions itself.

We can discuss theory and critique in the comments afterward.

Quick Summary

  • The” BSW” was created as a splinter group from “Die Linke”.
  • Die Linke” itself is also the product of earlier mergers and splits in German left politics.
  • The party was initially founded and led by Sahra Wagenknecht, but this was or is about to change.
  • Wagenknecht is married to Oskar Lafontaine, former SPD leader and prominent figure in Die Linke. She grew up in the GDR and is half-Iranian.
  • In the European Parliament, BSW sits with the Unified European Left (UEL), not GUE/NGL.

Sahra Wagenknecht: Background & Profile

Sahra Wagenknecht is one of the most prominent figures in German politics, known for her mix of left-leaning economic positions and culturally conservative messaging.

  • ** Early life & ideology:**

Born in the GDR to an East-German mother and Iranian father, she entered the PDS (the post-SED party) in the early 1990s. Her early writings were more traditionally Marxist, though her later positions diverge sharply from orthodox Marxism.

  • Career in Die Linke:

Served as Bundestag representative, economic spokesperson, and co-chair of the parliamentary faction. She became known for criticizing neoliberal reforms and EU austerity.

  • Internal conflicts:

Repeated disputes with other factions of Die Linke, especially over migration, cultural politics, and foreign policy, led to her eventual split.

  • Public image:

Combines left-wing economic rhetoric with conservative cultural critiques. Highly media-savvy and frequently on talk shows. She also writes a lot of books.

  • Personal ties:

Her marriage to Oskar Lafontaine further ties her to older social-democratic and post-communist political networks.

The BSW: Ideological & Policy Profile

The BSW positions itself as a party for “social justice, economic stability, and common sense,” blending social-democratic economics with socially conservative themes.

  • Economic Policy

Strongly interventionist; supports state regulation and higher taxes on the wealthy. Critical of privatization; favours re-municipalization of key services. Focus on cost-of-living issues, housing, and industrial decline. Pro-industrial strategy but anti-corporate in rhetoric.

  • Social & Cultural Policy

Rejects identity politics and “lifestyle leftism.” More restrictive migration stance than most European left parties. Emphasis on social cohesion, stability, and communitarian values.

  • Foreign Policy

Critical of NATO and U.S. foreign policy. Opposes weapons deliveries to Ukraine, favours negotiations and sanctions relief. Seeks restoration of economic ties with Russia (while officially condemning the invasion). Sceptical of deeper EU integration.

  • Environmental Policy

Supports climate goals but rejects consumption bans and “eco-austerity.” Emphasizes technological investment over regulatory restrictions.

Controversies, Local-Level Behaviour & Criticism

  • Local gains but conservative cooperation:

While BSW has achieved notable success in eastern state elections, it often cooperates with conservative or centrist parties at the local/state level, which critics view as inconsistent with its left-economic message .

  • Strong anti-“woke” stance:

The party sharply criticizes identity politics, gender policies, and cultural liberalism. This appeals to certain working-class voters but alienates much of the traditional left.

  • Accusations of pro-Kremlin alignment:

Opponents argue its Ukraine and NATO positions echo Russian narratives. These are political allegations; the party denies them, and verified evidence of Kremlin funding is lacking.

  • There was some suspicion on who funded the party , German news and donation watch list one family (listed as Thomas Stanger) that donated millions to the party.

  • Backlash over Ukraine-related remarks:

Wagenknecht has faced criticism for comments perceived as overly sympathetic to Russia or dismissive of Ukrainian concerns, though some viral claims are unverified or misrepresented.

The BSW is not a Marxist–Leninist party, nor does it claim to be its program is reformist, populist, and firmly within the framework of capitalist parliamentary politics.

Anyways, if you find something that is incorrect pls feel free to correct me. Also leave your comments and thoughts below.

N.B: This is in no way to promote this party. This post is more about informing people about it and critically discussing issues arising from such parties.

73

This was originally posted in r/TankieTheDeprogram by firefighter 430 (not the same image though). On reddit the ACP (American Communist Party) is infiltrating subreddits, and tried to infiltrate the tankie one too. Be aware that the ACP is not marxist nor are they communist. Pls stay safe everyone on lemmygrad.

9
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml to c/thedeprogram@lemmygrad.ml

Hello comrades,

(Origianlly posted in r/TankieTheDeprogram)

Belgium is in the middle of a nationwide strike week against the austerity agenda of Bart De Wever’s Arizona-coalition and right on cue, MR president Georges-Louis Bouchez, and Education Minister Valérie Glatigny (MR) held a conference in Liège to promote their neoliberal education reforms. It went about as well as you would expect.

Around 500 protesters, mobilized by Antifa and other left-wing groups, gathered near the Liège conference centre. When police blocked access, the crowd moved toward City Hall. About ten protesters tried to force the doors open, windows were smashed, and the offices of La Meuse and RTL were hit with paint, fruit, and eggs. As they deserve.

Police had prepared heavily: large deployments, container barricades, closed bridges and parks, and water cannons were eventually used to disperse the crowd in front of City Hall. This follows similar clashes at an MR meeting in September.

As expected, Bouchez filed a complaint and demanded the dissolution of Antifa, “liberals” once again showing that they are for fascism.

And of course, the Belgian subreddits are doing what they always do: handwringing over broken windows and paint, rather than supporting workers, students, and activists who are actually resisting the Arizona-coalition’s policies.

Feel free to discuss Belgian politics, the current union strikes, and the broader implications of these protests. How do you see working-class resistance developing in Wallonia and Flanders? What lessons can other movements take from these actions?

Also, please send solidarity to the workers on strike or, if you can, consider supporting or joining their union actions.

N.B.: I might make a separate post later about the Belgian protests, as well as the fact that the ARIZONA coalition finalized their budget agreement without taking the unions’ demands into account

Sources (links not included to avoid tracking):

  • VRT News: “Protest tegen MR-voorzitter Bouchez in Luik escaleert: demonstranten proberen stadhuis binnen te dringen”

  • RTL “Conference du MR à Liège: tout s’est déroulé dans le calme, 400 manifestants sur place”

  • Qu4tre: “Un mur de containers près du Palais des Congrès pour la venue de Georges-Louis Bouchez”

  • TodayinLiege: “La venue du président du MR G.L. Bouchez au Palais des Congrès ce mercredi fait craindre des heurts”

11
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Mantiddies@lemmygrad.ml to c/thedeprogram@lemmygrad.ml

Hey comrades,

(apologies for the repost it was originally posted in r/TankieTheDeprogram)

I want to open a discussion about decoloniality and postcolonial theory, specifically as they are deployed in Western European academia. I want to explore how these debates relate, or fail to relate to Marxist-Leninist theory, revolutionary praxis, and materialist anti-colonial analysis. Im mostly going to talk about postcolonialism in my text body, but I also state that scholars at my university have been using both decoloniality and post colonialism (even interchangeably)

According to ProleWiki, postcolonialism is described as:

“Postcolonialism is a form of anti-colonialism that focuses on attitudes and culture instead of material conditions. It claims that Marxism is Eurocentric. Post colonialists believe colonialism has so much of an impact that it is impossible to overcome it without returning to the past. By the 1990s, it became popular in imperial core universities because it believed revolution was impossible.”

ProleWiki: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Postcolonialism

From my experience, this matches what I have observed. In many academic contexts, “postcolonial thought” is used less to advance materialist or anti-imperialist analysis and more as a tool to attack Marxist theory. Marxism is labelled “Eurocentric,” while actual revolutionary or materialist analysis of colonialism, exploitation, imperialism, and class struggle is ignored, dismissed, ridiculed, or even banned.

In my own experience, I have even seen this personally: a white Dutch scholar (who conducts research in the Caribbean who mixes up decoloniality and postcolonialism) actively targeted me for my Marxist views while openly promoting (a Flemish) Christian conservative and (north Italian) fascist students and Dutch “anarchists.” This is a clear example of how postcolonial discourse can be used to protect reactionary politics while silencing revolutionary perspectives.

It often feels like postcolonial and "academic decoloniality" discourse has become a smokescreen for liberal or reactionary politics, allowing scholars to present themselves as “radical” while actively marginalizing proletarian, anti-imperialist, and revolutionary perspectives.

Discussion points:

  • Is postcolonial theory in academia primarily an ideological weapon against Marxism and revolutionary class struggle?

  • How have you experienced the use of “decoloniality” in academia? Is it counter-revolutionary or monopolizing the discourse? Should it even exist in its current form?

  • Also how do we deal with academics appropriating the political decolonial discourse to stay “en vogue” whilst not actually being leftists?

  • Isn’t the “Eurocentric” label misleading? While Marxism originated in the West, many successful non-Western revolutions were founded on Marxist principles and materialist analysis.

  • What do people think of Olufemi Taiwo’s work? How useful do you find his analysis from a Marxist-Leninist perspective?

  • Gramsci was a Marxist who wrote extensively about cultural hegemony. How do Marxist-Leninists here view his ideas? Are there lessons to take from him, or is his focus on culture and ideology too reformist compared to revolutionary Marxism? ( i have not read gramsci genuine question)

In my view, genuine decoloniality can only take place outside of academia; the real decoloniality that actually liberates people. This can only happen if we actively fight capitalism and imperialism, with the voice of the global working class leading the conversation and the struggle. Unlike the liberal ‘academic decolonization,’ which primarily serves the scholars themselves, revolutionary decoloniality is rooted in material struggle and praxis.

N.B.: I understand that decoloniality and postcolonialism are two separate concepts, though at my university scholars often conflate or use them together.

Anyways, drop your thoughts below. Let us build a space where committed leftists can debate, share perspectives, and recommend literature on decoloniality rooted in Marxist-Leninist analysis.

view more: next ›

Mantiddies

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 months ago