I want to! Even if it's just a little, I think adding context makes things like this so much better. Plus it gives you the opportunity to continue that story later if people like it!
LongerDonger
joined 1 year ago
Yes! I asked her before I started. I may be a degenerate, but I'm not that bad.
Nope, it's just an image. If the OP watermarked their content then their name will be in the image, but that's not always the case.
I suppose the appearance of OC is fine, but I do wish they'd add a source in the description so you could find who the person actually is if you like their content.
Adding the word "scientific" to your point doesn't make it more believable.
In fact, it detracts from your point by making you sound like you don't know how to use the word.
The source is Lover In Law.
It's engagement farming.
Notice how they're all questions? The way this works on other social media is you ask something in a community that most people will have an opinion on, but frame it opposite to that opinion (e.g. the tiny tits question), and that will give you a bunch of engagement through comments which tells the algorithm the post is more interesting so it pushes the post higher to raise visibility to keep people on the site longer to view more ads.
The thing is, Lemmy does not have an algorithm like that, so it's pointless to do here.
I wasn't suggesting you go out of your way to find the "most optimal fancy text generator". I'm saying it literally would have been quicker to Google it and just click on the first result. No appstore, no payment, no waiting for it to install.
Original artist appears to be shengtian.
Why pay for it when you can just Google "fancy text" and get a whole page of results for online tools that do it for free?
Reupload needed, the link has been deleted.
Here's a sneak peek of the progress for the next version of the LoRA:
I think the colours are better and everything is just a bit more consistent, but there is still more work to be done.