[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Sadly not yet.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Close, but not exactly. While this community is for in-depth discussion of Star Trek, we don't expect-- and in fact generally discourage-- answering from an in-universe perspective.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Certainly not. But they are nice to see.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

How do you square this with the Q apparently being quite mortal after all?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That is how the rules of this community work, yes.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

This leads me to wonder what Ferengi think of pierced ears.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This community is for in-depth discussion. While this is a pretty good joke, if it doesn't further an in-depth discussion of the matter at hand, it's not appropriate here.

Edit: stupid procedural memory, this isn't a subreddit at all!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

The simplest answer would be because it doesn't ordinarily work that way.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

No the fuck it isn't. Dualism is clearly true in Star Trek's universe and even if it weren't we see consciousness is maintained while beaming but is normally too brief to be perceived. (TNG: "Realm of Fear")

Beaming is no more death than sleeping, or existing for longer than a single Planck unit of time is.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Or sometimes "Ahead", in the same way Picard gets two.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

In essence, Discovery followed the same arc as the Star Wars sequel trilogy. They swung for the fences on doing something wild and asking difficult questions that the franchise had taken for granted; and even if the answer they arrived at was affirming, there were too many loud nerds that couldn't look past either the flaws that genuinely existed or their own shallow prejudices. Those nerds were loud enough and long enough that the studio walked it back to try to appease them and ended up with something much less interesting, which both alienated defenders of the early direction and could never appease the bad eggs whose criticisms weren't in good faith, leaving something that only a few appreciated.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I am confused by the choice to have the Klingons look like the redesign. This is TOS era so surely they should look like TOS era Klingons, no?

Gene always said that TOS Klingons would have had ridges the whole time if they'd had the budget for more elaborate makeup. Kor, Kang, and Koloth had the redesign. There's no proof that anyone outside of a handful in that Enterprise arc ever lost their ridges-- and would you really put it past the Klingons to lethally enforce a quarantine?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

LibraryLass

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF