[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I would just like to add that the gross-up close-up is canon.

https://youtu.be/Rr5i93ZhxdQ

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Accurate. He definitely holds up 3 fingers when he says that.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

One orange braincell

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I also pay for YouTube. I just don't normally bring it up because it usually results in a lot of rather unpleasant replies.

It's fascinating, really.

Google gets a lot of hate for being a data collection behemoth. The whole "if you aren't paying, you are the product" thing. And rightfully so.

And pirates love to say that if companies would just charge a reasonable rate for an easy-to-use service, then they would just pay instead of pirating.

But when it comes to YouTube, a lot of people seem to want to have it both ways.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

There was a citation in the original post. The screenshot cut it off.

The total cost of the US post-9/11 wars is $8 trillion by 2050, approximately 1/3 of which will go to veteran care and the majority of which has not yet been paid.

Yes, 1/3 by 2050 is not most. My bad.

Yes, it will continue to rise after 2050.

The statement that funding another country's military is cheaper than putting boots on the ground isn't a hot take or even a position. It is objectively true.

I don't like war. I'm not cheering for war. I don't endorse the parent post's take about it being a proxy war (have you never contributed to a conversation while simultaneously suppressing the urge to ackchyually the other person?). And I do hope that humanitarian assistance is provided down the line by the parties involved.

Call it a proxy war, or don't. It doesn't make any difference to me what people want to label it. That doesn't change the objective truth about the cost difference. Either way, I would love more of my tax dollars to be steered away from war and toward the problems in my own country.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

You're better than them!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

They literally just need people to show up and do basic things. As long as you aren't creating a disturbance, I can't see there being any issues.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Ubuntu is the most popular operating system across the major public cloud providers.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

For all we know, it was a temporal paradox in which Boimler was always the reason Spock changed back in the first place.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

There are definitely longer story arcs in Lower Decks :)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

What we need are more backend and full stack developers to shore up the core functionality. A polished mobile app is not going to cancel out the other shortcomings.

There are critical bugs and missing functions/features that need to be addressed first. Otherwise the masses are going to take one look and never return.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It makes sense for topical instances. For example, startrek.website is where /r/startrek and /r/daystrominstitute and /r/risa landed. I saw a post earlier about some all-things-gardening instance as well.

And just in general, I certainly wouldn't want to drink from the firehose. The whole reason I created an account on reddit over a decade ago was to limit what I saw on the front page. Aside from occasional usage for discoverability, I cannot imagine wanting to drink from every firehose, everywhere, all at once.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

JWBananas

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago