GathererStuff

What would be the performance implications? Isn't virtiofs theoretically faster?

Every other solution looks more elegant on paper but has lots of pitfalls

A very sane and fair comment.

Why not NFS? Regardless, wouldn't it be slower anyway compared to virtiofs?

I think NFS would be a better choice if I decide to go that route. Isn't SAMBA slower and older than NFS?

strace can be very verbose and requires a lot of knowledge that i doubt i can share through comments back and forth.

No worries. Thank a lot nonetheless.

is creating an intermediary like others have commented on in this post an option?

What do you mean by intermediary? Do you mean syncing the files with the VM and then sharing the synced copy with the host?That wouldn't work since my drive is smaller than the cloud drive and I need all the files on-demand.

It does not, hence my question.

do you have to provide a username/password or token when you try to access the drive now?

I do but it's through the proprietary GUI of the binary which has no CLI or API I can use.

I just checked and it is mounted as a fuse drive.

do you know how to use strace?

A very confident NO :)

Then I will try NFS and get back to you. Thanks :)

The cloud binary is proprietary and it's not supported by rclone unless I find out how the binary works but I doubt it uses something standardized like WebDAV underneath.

I can try but I might end up in the same situation as with virtiofs. The cloud drive will get unmounted and I will end up with an empty folder when I try to access it from the host.

The cloud drive is mounted on the guest, yes, but once I mount it with virtiofs in order to share it with the host it gets unmounted and I end up with an empty folder. bind doesn't work either.