"Crazy concept, but we're going to start only paying you for results (aka winning) and not just "effort," or lack thereof."
FutileRecipe
oh, these are all four years past their EOL. Yeesh.
Yeah, at a certain point it's the consumer's (and blog writer's) fault, and that's after EoL. Not patching a supported one and just getting rid of support, saying buy a newer one? Yeah, that's bad.
Continuing to not support an EoL model that you already don't support due to EoL (or even dropping support for an EoL model that no one expected you to support in the first place due to EoL)? Non-issue.
develop our factory base and our sourcing capability in alternative countries, like Cambodia, Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil, etc."
From the same article:
Trump has proposed a 60% tax on imports from China, plus a universal tariff of 10%-20% on imports from all foreign countries.
So those goods still get a tariff, probably raising prices for the American consumer, just not as steep as from China. I thought the primary goal of the tariff was to move production back to America (which is a whole thing and not as simple as flipping a switch), which this does not do...and it wasn't necessarily to try to limit China's economy,which it probably doesn't even put a dent in.
The Democrats did not fail us. WE DID. We failed.
Can the people, by definition, fail? What happened to the "will of the people" and democracy that Americans go on about?
If this is what won, this is obviously what the American people wanted/chose.
You actively sought loss...you didnt listen and lost...
I'm genuinely confused. What are you saying? The American voter currently only has two options: vote Democrat or vote Republican. Anything else, as it stands in present day America, throws the vote away.
I think you're saying voting Democrat is "actively seeking loss," yet the only other option is to...vote Republican, which they wanted even less?
Help me out here, as your logic ain't logicing.
The 2/3rds of American adults that are disenfranchised without representation are the victims.
The real victims (with a say/vote) are the Americans who voted for Harris. The people who voted for Trump and those who abstained from voting actively and passively chose what's coming.
The first, and foremost failure, is the Republican party.
They are not a failure. They are exactly what they want to be, they are exactly who they said they are, and they won the election. Sounds like the GOP is doing alright to me, from a GOP perspective.
And if you can't because they've been moved or "mysteriously misplaced," charge him for grand larceny and arrest him (IANAL so there is probably a better legal term for this).
I don't think that "sure, I stole from them, but I "lost" what I stole so we cool now," is a valid legal defense. But I'm not a disbarred lawyer, so I could be wrong.
Is there any chance that shit was rigged this time around?
There's always a chance of almost anything, but it is very slim (conspiracy theory) with no evidence to support it:
"Importantly, we have no evidence of any malicious activity that had a material impact on the security or integrity of our election infrastructure," per the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Director Jen Easterly.
Source: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/statement-cisa-director-easterly-security-2024-elections
Harris was popular when she first announced.
I don't think she was popular when first announced, rather the fact that not-Biden was popular.
Reuters has a different story....
https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/
Because if they start holding others in similar offices to account, they might have to hold themselves as well, and that ain't happening.