Definitely unpopular by the literal statistics. Definitely correct about the health benefits. Definitely something I don't do.
Also, it's a little strange that some desserts are only ever for special occasions (like cake), but others which may be just as difficult/expensive to make are considered regular fare (like ice cream).
Fair enough; the Internet is a silly place full of distracted, armchair philosophers. However, my entire point was that an LLM doesn't rely on machinery in the same way that a human brain does. That doesn't make AI "worse" or "better" overall, but it does make it an awful replacement for humans.
Introverts exist, and are... very often fine with solitude, prefer it generally over socializing.
Definitely! I am one :) but I still desire the presence of friends from time to time (and usually in small groups).
A person can outwardly appear to be healthy... and actually not be.
Yup! There's always a nonzero chance you're not as healthy as you think you are (let's call it the quantum theory of health: everyone is in a superposition of being both healthy and unhealthy at the same time), especially as we change due to age, making us unfamiliar with our own bodies... I'd tell you about my own challenges here, but that'd be TMI.
And, yes, that's why we go to regular checkups with someone who has a better perspective to judge "healthiness" (side note: doctors aren't perfect, so visiting them too frequently can be worse than never at all; there's a "healthy" cadence to checkups).
Therapy can give otherwise healthy people a method of exploring their inner selves more fully or more consistently...
This boils down to the definition of "healthy". It even becomes a philosophical question that's really hard to answer... Is it healthy to live a sedentary lifestyle? Is it healthy to exercise too much? Is it healthy to not know TIPP, in case you (or a loved one) gets a panic attack? Is it healthy to ignore yourself? Ignore others? Is it healthy to mention quantum superposition in a conversation about health? ;)
But, yes, I agree. Life's as messy and diverse and as hard to sum up as everybody whose ever lived, but yet we carry on ... I hope that's healthy.
Edit: typo, and missing a hint that I'm making a joke about me over-generalizing physics concepts
Hah, okay, you got me there. From my understanding, though, that's mostly because kids are still figuring out what's "normal", so their fear instinct isn't nearly as strong. I guess I should've stuck to the more instinctive sources of fear...
Regardless, that's not really my point. My point is an LLM doesn't rely on machinery in the same way that a human brain does. That doesn't make AI "worse" or "better" overall, but it does make it an awful replacement for other humans.
What am I implying? That their machinery is abnormal and they likely need assistance to live normal, healthy lives. That's literally why the fields of psychiatry and psychology exist: healthy people don't need doctors and therapists. Do you disagree?
One of my favorite papers! On a similar note, I recently started reading A Philosophy of Software Design by John Ousterhout. Although it's a lot more recent (2018), I'd argue it's required reading in light of the LLM hype craze.
Has "performance" or "merit" meant much to Trump for anything else?
ROFL using (claimed) age as a proxy for maturity. Classic.
... Biden did more for blue collar jobs in the States than anyone since Lyndon Johnson.
For fear of reminiscing "the good old days" ... Yes, I did like a lot of his policies, especially regarding linking (ever-so-slightly progressive) climate policy with blue collar jobs. The theory was that red states would see enough of the benefits (or the hope of benefits) to soften on the Left. That clearly didn't work out in the short-run. The Biden administration's biggest weakness is Trump's unfortunate strength: capturing media attention and driving a narrative, regardless of truth (i.e. bullshitting).
As long as it's actually rum. The fake stuff is a crime against humanity.
How Republicans feel about the economy changes depending on who the President is rather than the actual performance of the economy.
Although it seems they're particularly susceptible to it, this phenomenon isn't entirely constrained to Republicans. It's classic groupthink. Any idea or emotion that reenforces the group is good, and idea or emotion that threatens the group is bad.
If you're looking for news sources, AP and Reuters are a starting place but you should be reading as many different sources as you can. I hate to encourage the use of Google but news.google.com can be a useful resource for quickly finding a bunch of different sources covering the same topic.
Fully agree on AP and Reuters. They've got good journalists. As for aggregators, Google News is good, but I've found Ground News is better, and it's not run by a monopoly, so there's that.
I'm pretty sure they're trying to say that, if you were to realistically simulate orbital mechanics, the framework generates terrain 9 times faster than the player could reveal new terrain via orbiting, making it possible to calculate at runtime.