[-] ExFed@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

False dichotomy. What next? All men are toxic because of their masculinity?

It takes strength to empower others. Men are strong when they empower others (including women). That's literally all that Talarico is saying. How is that incompatible with feminism?

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago

Being married to a pollinator ecologist has taught me at least one thing: honeybees are overrated. Native bees are waaay cooler.

I'm glad the article said something about the impact to native bee populations, and I expect the same, but it would've been much nicer if the paper said something about them. For now we're stuck with speculation...

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

It could also be that it lacks the machinery to feel any emotions at all. You don't (normally) have to train people to be afraid of bears or heights or loneliness or boredom. You also don't (normally) have to train people to have empathy or compassion.

I argue that our obsession with AI is, itself, a misalignment with our environment; it disproportionately tickles psychological reward centers which evolved under unrecognizably different circumstances.

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

Agreed. I have a sense that, eventually, development communities will figure out etiquette and policies to govern LLM usage. But how do you enforce that kind of policy? Right now, it's essentially a judgement call by the maintainers. It's hard to catch sneaky LLM usage.

On the other hand, I think there are objectively good ways to use LLMs for software:

  • High-level design and planning
  • Technical Research (although this tends towards the most popular tech)
  • POCs & rapid prototyping
  • "Textbook" solutions
  • TDD Red/Green development (where the LLM generates failing tests based on the high-level spec, and the programmer writes the implementation)
[-] ExFed@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

OpenAI made a statement agreeing with Anthropic's "red lines". Google has yet to do the same, although there's been quite a lot of chatter from employees about it.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5758898-altman-backs-anthropic-pentagon-stand/

https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/27/employees-at-google-and-openai-support-anthropics-pentagon-stand-in-open-letter/

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

Whoa you gotta put an NSFW tag on images like these.

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

Taiwan will scuttle their microchip fabs before letting China take over. Unless China have infiltrated and taken over the fabs and secured them from destruction, there's far less economic value in invading Taiwan.

It looks like China is only a couple years away from building completely in-country fabs competitive with Taiwan. If that's the case, then Taiwan using the economic value of their microchip fabs as a defense may very soon come to an end.

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/how-china-built-its-manhattan-project-rival-west-ai-chips-2025-12-17/

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

You make it sound like the people behind the wheels of said cars have no choice. They do: slow down and vote for non-car-centric infrastructure. Motor vehicles are in the top ten causes of death, ahead of kidney disease, AIDS, and homicide. We should probably stop forcing ourselves to engage in such an extremely risky activity.

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

Agreed. As nice as clap is, it's not a combinator. Parser combinators have a the really nice feature of sharing the same "shape" as the data they parse, which makes them trivial to generate from a schema ... or to just use them to represent your schema in the first place ;) .

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

At this point, if someone says "don't vote because everyone sucks" I'm assuming they're secretly rooting for authoritarianism. Two things can be true at the same time: we can vote for someone who doesn't pass some bullshit purity test while also continuing to work towards a better society for all.

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

The greatest trick the devil pulled was convincing people he didn't exist. The greatest trick the Republican party pulled was convincing people that its most unpopular ideas are entirely Democrats' fault.

NAFTA was championed by, majority supported, and voted in by mostly Republicans. It was ultimately bipartisan, but Democrats were significantly more opposed to it than Republicans (of Republican Congress members, only 10 in the Senate and 43 in the House voted against it; of Democrats, 28 in the Senate and 156 in the House voted against it).

This isn't to say that NAFTA is objectively bad policy; most economists argue that it ultimately benefited the whole country. However it did expose US manufacturing to significant competition, reduced bargaining power for manufacturing workers, and shocked communities which were solely reliant on the sector to support them. Larger cities were mostly unaffected due to their more diverse economies, and in many cases thrived off increased trade and lower prices for goods. As a reminder, urbanites trend Democrat, rural folk trend Republican.

The trope that urban liberals successfully screwed over rural conservatives just isn't true. Instead it seems that, at screwing themselves over, urban liberals failed and rural conservatives succeeded.

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1031/vote_103_1_00395.htm https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/1993575

[-] ExFed@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

all profits are wages stolen

Except when all the work is done by the owners. Employee-owned companies exist and are usually much better to work for.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ExFed

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago